The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Properties of WHO Essential Drugs and Provisional Biopharmaceutical Classification
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to provisionally classify, based on the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), drugs in immediate-release dosage forms that appear on the World Health Organization (WHO) Essential Drug List. The classification in this report is based on the aqueous solubility of the drugs reported in commonly available reference literature and a correlation of human intestinal membrane permeability for a set of 29 reference drugs with their calculated partition coefficients. The WHO Essential Drug List consists of a total of 325 medicines and 260 drugs, of which 123 are oral drugs in immediate-release (IR) products. Drugs with dose numbers less than or equal to unity [Do = (maximum dose strength/250 mL)/solubility < or = 1] are defined as high-solubility drugs. Drug solubility for the uncharged, lowest-solubility form reported in the Merck Index or USP was used. Of the 123 WHO oral drugs in immediate-release dosage forms, 67% (82) were determined to be high-solubility drugs. The classification of permeability is based on correlations of human intestinal permeability of 29 reference drugs with the estimated log P or CLogP lipophilicity values. Metoprolol was chosen as the reference compound for permeability and log P or CLogP. Log P and CLogP were linearly correlated (r2 = 0.78) for 104 drugs. A total of 53 (43.1%) and 62 (50.4%) drugs on the WHO list exhibited log P and CLogP estimates, respectively, that were greater than or equal to the corresponding metoprolol value and are classified as high-permeability drugs. The percentages of the drugs in immediate-release dosage forms that were classified as BCS Class 1, Class 2, Class 3, and Class 4 drugs using dose number and log Pwere as follows: 23.6% in Class 1, 17.1% in Class 2, 31.7% in Class 3, and 10.6% in Class 4. The remaining 17.1% of the drugs could not be classified because of the inability to calculate log P values because of missing fragments. The corresponding percentages in the various BCS classes with dose number and CLogP criteria were similar: 28.5% in Class 1, 19.5% in Class 2, 35.0% in Class 3, and 9.8% in Class 4. The remaining 7.3% of the drugs could not be classified since CLogP could not be calculated. These results suggest that a satisfactory bioequivalence (BE) test for more than 55% of the high-solubility Class 1 and Class 3 drug products on the WHO Essential Drug List may be based on an in vitro dissolution test. The use of more easily implemented, routinely monitored, and reliable in vitro dissolution tests can ensure the clinical performance of drug products that appear on the WHO Essential Medicines List.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Amidon, G. L., Lennernäs, H., Shah, V. P., & Crison, J. R. (1995) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1016212804288 · Cited by 5,430
Self-citationDissolution Testing as a Prognostic Tool for Oral Drug Absorption: Immediate Release Dosage Forms
Dressman, J. B., Amidon, G. L., Reppas, C., & Shah, V. P. (1998) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1011984216775 · Cited by 1,097
Self-citation
Cited by
Wu, C.-Y., & Benet, L. Z. (2005) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-004-9004-4 · Cited by 1,401
The Role of Transporters in the Pharmacokinetics of Orally Administered Drugs
Shugarts, S., & Benet, L. Z. (2009) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-009-9924-0 · Cited by 438
BCS class IV drugs: Highly notorious candidates for formulation development
Ghadi, R., & Dand, N. (2017) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.01.014 · Cited by 361
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems of Curcumin for Cancer Chemoprevention
Bansal, S. S., Goel, M., Aqil, F., Vadhanam, M. V., & Gupta, R. C. (2011) · Cancer Prevention Research · doi:10.1158/1940-6207.capr-10-0006 · Cited by 353
Koźmiński, P., Halik, P. K., Chesori, R., & Gniazdowska, E. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21103483 · Cited by 326
Prasse, C., Schlüsener, M. P., Schulz, R., & Ternes, T. A. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es903216p · Cited by 317
Recent advances of discrete coordination complexes and coordination polymers in drug delivery
Ma, Z., & Moulton, B. (2011) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2011.01.031 · Cited by 310
Prediction of ADMET Properties
Norinder, U., & Bergström, C. A. S. (2006) · ChemMedChem · doi:10.1002/cmdc.200600155 · Cited by 285
Patel, A. R., & Vavia, P. R. (2007) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/aapsj0903041 · Cited by 273
Shah, V. P., & Amidon, G. L. (2014) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/s12248-014-9620-9 · Cited by 150
Self-citationNanonization techniques to overcome poor water-solubility with drugs
Da Silva, F. L. O., Marques, M. B. D. F., Kato, K. C., & Carneiro, G. (2020) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2020.1750591 · Cited by 136
Konsoula, R., & Jung, M. (2008) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.05.001 · Cited by 108
Novel poloxamer-based nanoemulsions to enhance the intestinal absorption of active compounds
BRUSEWITZ, C., SCHENDLER, A., FUNKE, A., WAGNER, T., & LIPP, R. (2007) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.08.022 · Cited by 86
Margolskee, A., Darwich, A. S., Pepin, X., Pathak, S. M., Bolger, M. B., Aarons, L., Rostami-Hodjegan, A., Angstenberger, J., Graf, F., Laplanche, L., et al. (2017) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2016.09.027 · Cited by 43
Self-citation(2009) · Scientific Research and Essays · doi:10.5897/sre.9000747 · Cited by 33
Innovative formulations for the delivery of levothyroxine to the skin
Padula, C., Nicoli, S., & Santi, P. (2009) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.12.028 · Cited by 32
Mendes, C., Buttchevitz, A., Kruger, J. H., Kratz, J. M., Simões, C. M. O., de Oliveira Benedet, P., Oliveira, P. R., & Silva, M. A. S. (2016) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2015.12.015 · Cited by 31
Levothyroxine sodium pentahydrate tablets – formulation considerations
Kaur, N., & Suryanarayanan, R. (2021) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2021.08.006 · Cited by 19
Cook, J. (2015) · Dissolution Technologies · doi:10.14227/dt220215p6 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Kasim, N. A., Whitehouse, M., Ramachandran, C., Bermejo, M., Lennernäs, H., Hussain, A. S., Junginger, H. E., Stavchansky, S. A., Midha, K. K., Shah, V. P., & Amidon, G. L.
- Venue
- Molecular Pharmaceutics
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-12-17
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-96
- ISSN
- 1543-8384 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-8392
- OpenAlex
- W1971181330
- Cited by
- 847
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.