The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biological Evaluation of Polyester Dendrimer: Poly(ethylene oxide) “Bow-Tie” Hybrids with Tunable Molecular Weight and Architecture
Abstract
High molecular weight (MW) polymers have shown promise in terms of improving the properties and the efficacy of low MW therapeutics. However, new systems that are highly biocompatible, are biodegradable, have well-defined MW, and have multiple functional groups for drug attachment are still needed. The biological evaluation of a library of eight polyester dendrimer-poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) bow-tie hybrids is described here. The group of evaluated polymers was designed to include a range of MWs (from 20000 to 160000) and architectures with the number of PEO arms ranging from two to eight. In vitro experiments revealed that the polymers were nontoxic to cells and were degraded to lower MW species at pH 7.4 and pH 5.0. Biodistribution studies with (125)I-radiolabeled polymers showed that the high MW carriers (>40000) exhibited long circulation half-lives. Comparison of the renal clearances for the four-arm versus eight-arm polymers indicated that the more branched polymers were excreted more slowly into the urine, a result attributed to their decreased flexibility. Due to their essentially linear architecture that does not provide for good isolation of the iodinated phenolic moieties, the polymers with "two arms" were rapidly taken up by the liver. The biodistributions of two long-circulating high MW polymers in mice bearing subcutaneous B16F10 tumors were evaluated, and high levels of tumor accumulation were observed. These new carriers are therefore promising for applications in drug delivery and are also useful for improving our understanding of the effect of polymer architecture on pharmacokinetic properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Polyester Dendritic Systems for Drug Delivery Applications: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation
Padilla De Jesús, O. L., Ihre, H. R., Gagne, L., Fréchet, J. M. J., & Szoka, F. C. (2002) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/bc010103m · Cited by 507
Self-citation
Cited by
Dendrimer toxicity: Let's meet the challenge
Jain, K., Kesharwani, P., Gupta, U., & Jain, N. K. (2010) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.04.027 · Cited by 710
Kunzmann, A., Andersson, B., Thurnherr, T., Krug, H., Scheynius, A., & Fadeel, B. (2011) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2010.04.007 · Cited by 527
Poly (2-oxazoline) s as polymer therapeutics
Luxenhofer, R., Han, Y., Schulz, A., Tong, J., He, Z., Kabanov, A. V., & Jordan, R. (2012) · Macromolecular Rapid Communications · doi:10.1002/marc.201200354 · Cited by 470
Biodegradable Polymer Nanogels for Drug/Nucleic Acid Delivery
Li, Y., Maciel, D., Rodrigues, J., Shi, X., & Tomás, H. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500131f · Cited by 478
Janaszewska, A., Lazniewska, J., Trzepiński, P., Marcinkowska, M., & Klajnert-Maculewicz, B. (2019) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom9080330 · Cited by 409
Biodegradable dendritic positron-emitting nanoprobes for the noninvasive imaging of angiogenesis
Almutairi, A., Rossin, R., Shokeen, M., Hagooly, A., Ananth, A., Capoccia, B., Guillaudeu, S., Abendschein, D., Anderson, C. J., Welch, M. J., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0811757106 · Cited by 235
Self-citationKaminskas, L. M., Kelly, B. D., McLeod, V. M., Sberna, G., Owen, D. J., Boyd, B. J., & Porter, C. J. H. (2011) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.02.005 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Gillies, E. R., Dy, E., Fréchet, J. M. J., & Szoka, F. C.
- Venue
- Molecular Pharmaceutics
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-02-09
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-138
- ISSN
- 1543-8384 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-8392
- OpenAlex
- W1972975847
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.