Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biological Evaluation of Polyester Dendrimer: Poly(ethylene oxide) “Bow-Tie” Hybrids with Tunable Molecular Weight and Architecture

Gillies, Elizabeth R., Dy, Edward, Fréchet, Jean M. J., Szoka, Francis C.·2005·Molecular Pharmaceutics

Abstract

High molecular weight (MW) polymers have shown promise in terms of improving the properties and the efficacy of low MW therapeutics. However, new systems that are highly biocompatible, are biodegradable, have well-defined MW, and have multiple functional groups for drug attachment are still needed. The biological evaluation of a library of eight polyester dendrimer-poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) bow-tie hybrids is described here. The group of evaluated polymers was designed to include a range of MWs (from 20000 to 160000) and architectures with the number of PEO arms ranging from two to eight. In vitro experiments revealed that the polymers were nontoxic to cells and were degraded to lower MW species at pH 7.4 and pH 5.0. Biodistribution studies with (125)I-radiolabeled polymers showed that the high MW carriers (>40000) exhibited long circulation half-lives. Comparison of the renal clearances for the four-arm versus eight-arm polymers indicated that the more branched polymers were excreted more slowly into the urine, a result attributed to their decreased flexibility. Due to their essentially linear architecture that does not provide for good isolation of the iodinated phenolic moieties, the polymers with "two arms" were rapidly taken up by the liver. The biodistributions of two long-circulating high MW polymers in mice bearing subcutaneous B16F10 tumors were evaluated, and high levels of tumor accumulation were observed. These new carriers are therefore promising for applications in drug delivery and are also useful for improving our understanding of the effect of polymer architecture on pharmacokinetic properties.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/mp049886u

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Gillies, E. R., Dy, E., Fréchet, J. M. J., & Szoka, F. C.
Venue
Molecular Pharmaceutics
Published
2005-02-09
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
129-138
ISSN
  • 1543-8384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-8392
OpenAlex
W1972975847
Cited by
265
References
1
FWCI
14.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.