Cited by 65Computational Drug Discovery MethodsDrug Solubulity and Delivery SystemsPharmaceutical studies and practices

Predicting Pharmacokinetic Profiles Using in Silico Derived Parameters

Hosea, Natalie A., Jones, Hannah M.·2013·Molecular Pharmaceutics

Abstract

Human pharmacokinetic (PK) predictions play a critical role in assessing the quality of potential clinical candidates where the accurate estimation of clearance, volume of distribution, bioavailability, and the plasma-concentration-time profiles are the desired end points. While many methods for conducting predictions utilize in vivo data, predictions can be conducted successfully from in vitro or in silico data, applying modeling and simulation techniques. This approach can be facilitated using commercially available prediction software such as GastroPlus which has been reported to accurately predict the oral PK profile of small drug-like molecules. Herein, case studies are described where GastroPlus modeling and simulation was employed using in silico or in vitro data to predict PK profiles in early discovery. The results obtained demonstrate the feasibility of adequately predicting plasma-concentration-time profiles with in silico derived as well as in vitro measured parameters and hence predicting PK profiles with minimal data. The applicability of this approach can provide key information enabling decisions on either dose selection, chemistry strategy to improve compounds, or clinical protocol design, thus demonstrating the value of modeling and simulation in both early discovery and exploratory development for predicting absorption and disposition profiles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/mp300482w

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hosea, N. A., & Jones, H. M.
Affiliations
Pfizer (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Hosea, Natalie A.
Venue
Molecular Pharmaceutics
Published
2013-03-07
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
1207-1215
ISSN
  • 1543-8384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-8392
OpenAlex
W2004576565
Cited by
65
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Pharmaceutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
pharmacokinetic prediction, in silico modeling, GastroPlus, oral drug absorption, plasma concentration-time curve, in vitro-in vivo extrapolation, drug clearance, volume of distribution, bioavailability, early drug discovery, dose selection, drug-likeness
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Animals, Biological Availability, Computer Simulation, Humans, Models, Chemical, Permeability, Pharmacokinetics, Software, Solubility, Tetrahydronaphthalenes, Valine, Drug Design, Area Under Curve, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review