Cited by 33Computational Drug Discovery MethodsDrug Solubulity and Delivery SystemsPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling in Lead Optimization. 1. Evaluation and Adaptation of GastroPlus To Predict Bioavailability of Medchem Series

Daga, Pankaj R., Bolger, Michael B., Haworth, Ian S., Clark, Robert D., Martin, Eric J.·2018·Molecular Pharmaceutics

Abstract

When medicinal chemists need to improve bioavailability (%F) within a chemical series during lead optimization, they synthesize new series members with systematically modified properties mainly by following experience and general rules of thumb. More quantitative models that predict %F of proposed compounds from chemical structure alone have proven elusive. Global empirical %F quantitative structure–property (QSPR) models perform poorly, and projects have too little data to train local %F QSPR models. Mechanistic oral absorption and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models simulate the dissolution, absorption, systemic distribution, and clearance of a drug in preclinical species and humans. Attempts to build global PBPK models based purely on calculated inputs have not achieved the <2-fold average error needed to guide lead optimization. In this work, local GastroPlus PBPK models are instead customized for individual medchem series. The key innovation was building a local QSPR for a numerically fitted effective intrinsic clearance (CL loc ). All inputs are subsequently computed from structure alone, so the models can be applied in advance of synthesis. Training CL loc on the first 15–18 rat %F measurements gave adequate predictions, with clear improvements up to about 30 measurements, and incremental improvements beyond that.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00972

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daga, P. R., Bolger, M. B., Haworth, I. S., Clark, R. D., & Martin, E. J.
Affiliations
  • Novartis Institute of Biomedical Research, Emeryville, California 94608, United States
  • Simulations Plus (United States) (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Molecular Pharmaceutics
Published
2018-01-16
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
821-830
ISSN
  • 1543-8384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-8392
OpenAlex
W2783115227
Cited by
33
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Pharmaceutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Keywords
physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling, GastroPlus, bioavailability prediction, lead optimization, oral absorption, structure-activity relationship
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Animals, Biological Availability, Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Computer Simulation, Enzyme Inhibitors, Humans, Intestinal Absorption, Microsomes, Liver, Models, Biological, Tissue Distribution, Caco-2 Cells, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, 11-beta-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 1, Rats, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-pim-1, Drug Discovery, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review