The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Superparamagnetic Fe2O3 Beads−CdSe/ZnS Quantum Dots Core−Shell Nanocomposite Particles for Cell Separation
Abstract
This paper describes the synthesis of new nanocomposite nanoparticles that consist of polymer coated γ-Fe 2 O 3 superparamagnetic cores and CdSe/ZnS quantum dots (QDs) shell. A single layer of QDs was bound to the surface of thiol-modified magnetic beads through the formation of thiol−metal bonds to form luminescent/magnetic nanocomposite particles. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and energy disperse spectroscopy (EDS) were used to characterize the size, size distribution, and composition of the luminescent/magnetic nanoparticles. Their average diameter was 30 nm with a size variation of ±15%. The nanoparticles were modified with carboxylic groups to increase their miscibility in aqueous solution. A 3-fold decrease in the luminescence quantum yield of the luminescent/magnetic particles and a slight blue shift in their emission peaks compared to individual luminescent QDs were observed. However, the particles were bright and were easily observed using a conventional fluorescence microscope. Additionally, no apparent broadening of the luminescence peak of the QDs could be seen. The luminescent/magnetic nanoparticles were easily separated from solution by magnetic decantation using a permanent magnet. The new particles could be used in a variety of bioanalytical assays involving luminescence detection and magnetic separation. To demonstrate their utility we immobilized anticycline E antibodies on their surface and used the antibody coated particles to separate MCF-7 breast cancer cells from serum solutions. Anticycline E antibodies bind specifically to cycline, a protein which is specifically expressed on the surface of breast cancer cells. The separated breast cells were easily observed by fluorescence imaging microscopy due to the strong luminescence of the luminescent/magnetic nanocomposite particles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dabbousi, B. O., Rodriguez-Viejo, J., Mikulec, F. V., Heine, J. R., Mattoussi, H., Ober, R., Jensen, K. F., & Bawendi, M. G. (1997) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp971091y · Cited by 4,229
Cited by
Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis and surface functionalization strategies
Wu, W., He, Q., & Jiang, C. (2008) · Nanoscale Research Letters · doi:10.1007/s11671-008-9174-9 · Cited by 2,300
Multimodality Imaging Probes: Design and Challenges
Louie, A. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9003538 · Cited by 1,044
Nanotechnology applications in cancer
Nie, S., Xing, Y., Kim, G. J., & Simons, J. W. (2007) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.060906.152025 · Cited by 952
Organic Phase Syntheses of Magnetic Nanoparticles and Their Applications
Wu, L., Mendoza-Garcia, A., Li, Q., & Sun, S. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00687 · Cited by 601
Oh, J. K., & Park, J. M. (2011) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.08.005 · Cited by 427
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, D., He, J., Rosenzweig, N., & Rosenzweig, Z.
- Venue
- Nano Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-01-24
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 409-413
- ISSN
- 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6992
- OpenAlex
- W2090316456
- Cited by
- 589
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.