Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 516

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Enrichment of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes by Diameter in Density Gradients

Arnold, Michael S., Stupp, Samuel I., Hersam, Mark C.·2005·Nano Letters

Abstract

The bulk enrichment and separation of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) by diameter has been achieved through ultracentrifugation of DNA-wrapped SWNTs in aqueous density gradients. The separation is identified by the visual formation of colored bands of SWNTs in the density range of 1.11-1.17 g cm(-3). The optical absorbance spectra of the separated SWNTs indicate that SWNTs of decreasing diameter are increasingly more buoyant. This nondestructive and scalable separation strategy is expected to impact the fields of molecular electronics, optoelectronics, and sensing where SWNTs of a monodisperse band gap are essential.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nl050133o

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 516

Metadata

Authors
Arnold, M. S., Stupp, S. I., & Hersam, M. C.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2005-03-12
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
713-718
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W1978245540
Cited by
516
References
0
FWCI
14.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enrichment of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes by Diameter in Density Gradients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/nl050133o
The paper
Arnold, M. S., Stupp, S. I., & Hersam, M. C. (2005). Enrichment of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes by Diameter in Density Gradients. Nano Letters. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl050133o

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.