The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identifying the Mechanism of Biosensing with Carbon Nanotube Transistors
Abstract
Carbon nanotube transistors have outstanding potential for electronic detection of biomolecules in solution. The physical mechanism underlying sensing however remains controversial, which hampers full exploitation of these promising nanosensors. Previously suggested mechanisms are electrostatic gating, changes in gate coupling, carrier mobility changes, and Schottky barrier effects. We argue that each mechanism has its characteristic effect on the liquid gate potential dependence of the device conductance. By studying both the electron and hole conduction, the sensing mechanisms can be unambiguously identified. From extensive protein-adsorption experiments on such devices, we find that electrostatic gating and Schottky barrier effects are the two relevant mechanisms, with electrostatic gating being most reproducible. If the contact region is passivated, sensing is shown to be dominated by electrostatic gating, which demonstrates that the sensitive part of a nanotube transistor is not limited to the contact region, as previously suggested. Such a layout provides a reliable platform for biosensing with nanotubes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Enzyme-coated carbon nanotubes as single-molecule biosensors
Besteman, K., Lee, J.-O., Wiertz, F. G. M., Heering, H. A., & Dekker, C. (2003) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl034139u · Cited by 1,294
Self-citation
Cited by
Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment
Qu, X., Alvarez, P. J. J., & Li, Q. (2013) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.058 · Cited by 2,444
Subthreshold Regime has the Optimal Sensitivity for Nanowire FET Biosensors
Gao, X. P. A., Zheng, G., & Lieber, C. M. (2010) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl9034219 · Cited by 571
Supersensitive, Fast‐Response Nanowire Sensors by Using Schottky Contacts
Hu, Y., Zhou, J., Yeh, P., Li, Z., Wei, T., & Wang, Z. L. (2010) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201000278 · Cited by 346
Dual‐Gate Organic Field‐Effect Transistors as Potentiometric Sensors in Aqueous Solution
Spijkman, M., Brondijk, J. J., Geuns, T. C. T., Smits, E. C. P., Cramer, T., Zerbetto, F., Stoliar, P., Biscarini, F., Blom, P. W. M., & de Leeuw, D. M. (2010) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.200901830 · Cited by 154
Huang, W., Besar, K., LeCover, R., Dulloor, P., Sinha, J., Martínez Hardigree, J. F., Pick, C., Swavola, J., Everett, A. D., Frechette, J., et al. (2014) · Chem. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3sc52638k · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Heller, I., Janssens, A. M., Männik, J., Minot, E. D., Lemay, S. G., & Dekker, C.
- Venue
- Nano Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-12-28
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 591-595
- ISSN
- 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6992
- OpenAlex
- W2017631291
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 33.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.