The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Real-Time Intravital Imaging of RGD−Quantum Dot Binding to Luminal Endothelium in Mouse Tumor Neovasculature
Open accessAbstract
Nanoscale materials have increasingly become subject to intense investigation for use in cancer diagnosis and therapy. However, there is a fundamental dearth in cellular-level understanding of how nanoparticles interact within the tumor environment in living subjects. Adopting quantum dots (qdots) for their excellent brightness, photostability, monodispersity, and fluorescent yield, we link arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) peptides to target qdots specifically to newly formed/forming blood vessels expressing alpha vbeta 3 integrins. Using this model nanoparticle system, we exploit intravital microscopy with subcellular ( approximately 0.5 microm) resolution to directly observe and record, for the first time, the binding of nanoparticle conjugates to tumor blood vessels in living subjects. This generalizable method enabled us to show that in this model qdots do not extravasate and, unexpectedly, that they only bind as aggregates rather than individually. This level of understanding is critical on the path toward ensuring regulatory approval of nanoparticles in humans for disease diagnostics and therapeutics. Equally vital, the work provides a platform by which to design and optimize molecularly targeted nanoparticles including quantum dots for applications in living subjects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges
Ferrari, M. (2005) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1566 · Cited by 4,558
Renal clearance of quantum dots
Soo Choi, H., Liu, W., Misra, P., Tanaka, E., Zimmer, J. P., Itty Ipe, B., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1340 · Cited by 4,476
Immune cell migration in inflammation: present and future therapeutic targets
Luster, A. D., Alon, R., & von Andrian, U. H. (2005) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni1275 · Cited by 1,313
Cited by
Nanoparticle PEGylation for Imaging and Therapy
Jokerst, J. V., Lobovkina, T., Zare, R. N., & Gambhir, S. S. (2011) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/nnm.11.19 · Cited by 2,046
Self-citationCarbon Dots for Optical Imaging in Vivo
Yang, S.-T., Cao, L., Luo, P. G., Lu, F., Wang, X., Wang, H., Meziani, M. J., Liu, Y., Qi, G., & Sun, Y.-P. (2009) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja904843x · Cited by 1,519
Nanomaterials for Theranostics: Recent Advances and Future Challenges
Lim, E.-K., Kim, T., Paik, S., Haam, S., Huh, Y.-M., & Lee, K. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300213b · Cited by 1,233
Nanomaterials for In Vivo Imaging
Smith, B. R., & Gambhir, S. S. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00073 · Cited by 1,075
Self-citationQuantum dots: bright and versatile in vitro and in vivo fluorescence imaging biosensors
Wegner, K. D., & Hildebrandt, N. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00532e · Cited by 984
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, B. R., Cheng, Z., De, A., Koh, A. L., Sinclair, R., & Gambhir, S. S.
- Venue
- Nano Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-04-04
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2599-2606
- ISSN
- 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6992
- OpenAlex
- W2068608756
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.