The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Graphene in Mice: Ultrahigh In Vivo Tumor Uptake and Efficient Photothermal Therapy
Abstract
Although biomedical applications of carbon nanotubes have been intensively studied in recent years, its sister, graphene, has been rarely explored in biomedicine. In this work, for the first time we study the in vivo behaviors of nanographene sheets (NGS) with polyethylene glycol (PEG) coating by a fluorescent labeling method. In vivo fluorescence imaging reveals surprisingly high tumor uptake of NGS in several xenograft tumor mouse models. Distinctive from PEGylated carbon nanotubes, PEGylated NGS shows several interesting in vivo behaviors including highly efficient tumor passive targeting and relatively low retention in reticuloendothelial systems. We then utilize the strong optical absorbance of NGS in the near-infrared (NIR) region for in vivo photothermal therapy, achieving ultraefficient tumor ablation after intravenous administration of NGS and low-power NIR laser irradiation on the tumor. Furthermore, no obvious side effect of PEGylated NGS is noted for the injected mice by histology, blood chemistry, and complete blood panel analysis in our pilot toxicity study. Although a lot more efforts are required to further understand the in vivo behaviors and the long-term toxicology of this new type of nanomaterials, our work is the first success of using carbon nanomaterials for efficient in vivo photothermal therapy by intravenous administration and suggests the great promise of graphene in biomedical applications, such as cancer treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Geim, A. K., & Novoselov, K. S. (2007) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1849 · Cited by 39,979
Graphene-based composite materials
Stankovich, S., Dikin, D. A., Dommett, G. H. B., Kohlhaas, K. M., Zimney, E. J., Stach, E. A., Piner, R. D., Nguyen, S. T., & Ruoff, R. S. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04969 · Cited by 12,922
Narrow graphene nanoribbons from carbon nanotubes
Jiao, L., Zhang, L., Wang, X., Diankov, G., & Dai, H. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07919 · Cited by 2,441
Cited by
Graphene oxide as a chemically tunable platform for optical applications
Loh, K. P., Bao, Q., Eda, G., & Chhowalla, M. (2010) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.907 · Cited by 3,340
Ultrasmall Reduced Graphene Oxide with High Near-Infrared Absorbance for Photothermal Therapy
Robinson, J. T., Tabakman, S. M., Liang, Y., Wang, H., Sanchez Casalongue, H., Vinh, D., & Dai, H. (2011) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja2010175 · Cited by 2,099
Nano-graphene in biomedicine: theranostic applications
Yang, K., Feng, L., Shi, X., & Liu, Z. (2013) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c2cs35342c · Cited by 1,634
Self-citationDestructive extraction of phospholipids from Escherichia coli membranes by graphene nanosheets
Tu, Y., Lv, M., Xiu, P., Huynh, T., Zhang, M., Castelli, M., Liu, Z., Huang, Q., Fan, C., Fang, H., et al. (2013) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2013.125 · Cited by 1,508
Self-citationCopper Selenide Nanocrystals for Photothermal Therapy
Hessel, C. M., Pattani, V. P., Rasch, M., Panthani, M. G., Koo, B., Tunnell, J. W., & Korgel, B. A. (2011) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl201400z · Cited by 1,451
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, K., Zhang, S., Zhang, G., Sun, X., Lee, S.-T., & Liu, Z.
- Venue
- Nano Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-08-04
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3318-3323
- ISSN
- 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6992
- OpenAlex
- W1977791081
- Cited by
- 2,407
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 70.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.