Cited by 83

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ultralow Thermal Conductivity in Polycrystalline CdSe Thin Films with Controlled Grain Size

Feser, Joseph P., Chan, Emory M., Majumdar, Arun, Segalman, Rachel A., Urban, Jeffrey J.·2013·Nano Letters

Abstract

Polycrystallinity leads to increased phonon scattering at grain boundaries and is known to be an effective method to reduce thermal conductivity in thermoelectric materials. However, the fundamental limits of this approach are not fully understood, as it is difficult to form uniform sub-20 nm grain structures. We use colloidal nanocrystals treated with functional inorganic ligands to obtain nanograined films of CdSe with controlled characteristic grain size between 3 and 6 nm. Experimental measurements demonstrate that thermal conductivity in these composites can fall beneath the prediction of the so-called minimum thermal conductivity for disordered crystals. The measurements are consistent, however, with diffuse boundary scattering of acoustic phonons. This apparent paradox can be explained by an overattribution of transport to high-energy phonons in the minimum thermal conductivity model where, in compound semiconductors, optical and zone edge phonons have low group velocity and high scattering rates.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nl400531f

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Ma Y., 2008, Nano Lett., 8, 2580, 10.1021/nl8009928 · DOI
  2. Poudel B., 2008, Science, 320, 634, 10.1126/science.1156446 · DOI
  3. Wang X. W., 2008, Appl. Phys. Lett., 93, 193121, 10.1063/1.3027060 · DOI
  4. Biswas K., 2012, Nature, 489, 414, 10.1038/nature11439 · DOI
  5. Parrott J. E., 1969, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys., 2, 147, 10.1088/0022-3719/2/1/320 · DOI
  6. Goldsmid H. J., 1968, Phys Lett. A, 27, 523, 10.1016/0375-9601(68)90898-0 · DOI
  7. Bux S. K., 2009, Adv. Funct. Mater., 19, 2445, 10.1002/adfm.200900250 · DOI
  8. Foley B. M., 2012, Appl. Phys. Lett., 101, 231908, 10.1063/1.4769448 · DOI
  9. Wang Z. J., 2011, Nano Lett., 11, 2206, 10.1021/nl1045395 · DOI
  10. Joshi G., 2008, Nano Lett., 8, 4670, 10.1021/nl8026795 · DOI
  11. Minnich A. J., 2009, Phys. Rev. B, 80, 155327, 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.155327 · DOI
  12. Kovalenko M. V., 2009, Science, 324, 1417, 10.1126/science.1170524 · DOI
  13. Todorov T. K., 2010, Adv. Mater., 22, E156, 10.1002/adma.200904155 · DOI
  14. Yuan M., 2010, Chem. Mater., 22, 285, 10.1021/cm903428f · DOI
  15. Mitzi D. B., 2009, Thin Solid Films, 517, 2158, 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.10.079 · DOI
  16. Liu W., 2010, Chem. Mater., 22, 1010, 10.1021/cm901950q · DOI
  17. Mitzi D. B., 2004, Nature, 428, 299, 10.1038/nature02389 · DOI
  18. Milliron D. J., 2007, Nat. Mater., 6, 352, 10.1038/nmat1887 · DOI
  19. Kovalenko M. V., 2010, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132, 6686, 10.1021/ja909591x · DOI
  20. Wang R. Y., 2010, Chem. Mater., 22, 1943, 10.1021/cm903769q · DOI
  21. Sofo J. O., 1995, J. Appl. Phys., 77, 1561, 10.1063/1.358907 · DOI
  22. Chan E. M., 2010, Nano Lett., 10, 1874, 10.1021/nl100669s · DOI
  23. Koh Y. K., 2009, J. Appl. Phys., 105, 054303, 10.1063/1.3078808 · DOI
  24. Cahill D. G., 1992, Phys. Rev. B, 46, 6131, 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.6131 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Morelli D. T., 2002, Phys. Rev. B, 66, 195304, 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.195304 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Slack G. A., 1972, Phys. Rev. B, 6, 3791, 10.1103/PhysRevB.6.3791 · DOI
  27. Ioffe A. V., 1960, Sov. Phys. Solid State, 2, 719
  28. Hsieh W. P., 2011, Phys. Rev. B, 83, 174205, 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.174205 · DOI
  29. Deligoz E., 2006, Physica B, 373, 124, 10.1016/j.physb.2005.11.099 · DOI
  30. Callaway J., 1959, Phys. Rev., 113, 1046, 10.1103/PhysRev.113.1046 · DOI
  31. Berman R., 1952, Proc. Phys. Soc., London, Sect. B, 65, 1016
  32. Yang H. S., 2010, Phys. Rev. B, 81, 104203, 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.104203 · DOI
  33. Chiritescu C., 2007, Science, 315, 351, 10.1126/science.1136494 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Mitzi D. B., 2005, Adv. Mater., 17, 1285, 10.1002/adma.200401443 · DOI
  35. Dalpian G. M., 2006, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 226802, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.226802 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Feser, J. P., Chan, E. M., Majumdar, A., Segalman, R. A., & Urban, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana−Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States
  • The Molecular Foundry, Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2013-04-29
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
2122-2127
ISSN
  • 1530-6984
  • 1530-6992
Cited by
83
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review