Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 566

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Are There Fundamental Limitations on the Sheet Resistance and Transmittance of Thin Graphene Films?

De, Sukanta, Coleman, Jonathan N.·2010·ACS Nano

Abstract

From published transmittance and sheet resistance data, we have calculated a figure of merit for transparent, conducting graphene films; the DC to optical conductivity ratio, sigma(DC)/sigma(Op). For most reported results, this conductivity ratio clusters around the values sigma(DC)/sigma(Op) = 0.7, 4.5, and 11. We show that these represent fundamental limiting values for networks of graphene flakes, undoped graphene stacks, and graphite films, respectively. The limiting value for graphene flake networks is much too low for transparent-electrode applications. For graphite, a conductivity ratio of 11 gives R(s) = 377Omega/ for T = 90%, far short of the 10 Omega/ minimum requirement for transparent conductors in current driven applications. However, we suggest that substrate-induced doping can potentially increase the 2-dimensional DC conductivity enough to make graphene a viable transparent conductor. We show that four randomly stacked graphene layers can display T approximately 90% and 10 Omega/ if the product of carrier density and mobility reaches nmu = 1.3 x 10(17) V(-1) s(-1). Given achieved doping values and attainable mobilities, this is just possible, resulting in potential values of sigma(DC)/sigma(Op) of up to 330. This is high enough for any transparent conductor application.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nn100343f

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 566

Metadata

Authors
De, S., & Coleman, J. N.
Venue
ACS Nano
Published
2010-04-12
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
2713-2720
ISSN
  • 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-086X
OpenAlex
W2020823358
Cited by
566
References
4
FWCI
19.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.