The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Compression Behavior of Single-Layer Graphenes
Open accessAbstract
Central to most applications involving monolayer graphenes is its mechanical response under various stress states. To date most of the work reported is of theoretical nature and refers to tension and compression loading of model graphenes. Most of the experimental work is indeed limited to the bending of single flakes in air and the stretching of flakes up to typically approximately 1% using plastic substrates. Recently we have shown that by employing a cantilever beam we can subject single graphenes to various degrees of axial compression. Here we extend this work much further by measuring in detail both stress uptake and compression buckling strain in single flakes of different geometries. In all cases the mechanical response is monitored by simultaneous Raman measurements through the shift of either the G or 2D phonons of graphene. Despite the infinitely small thickness of the monolayers, the results show that graphenes embedded in plastic beams exhibit remarkable compression buckling strains. For large length (l)-to-width (w) ratios (> or =0.2) the buckling strain is of the order of -0.5% to -0.6%. However, for l/w < 0.2 no failure is observed for strains even higher than -1%. Calculations based on classical Euler analysis show that the buckling strain enhancement provided by the polymer lateral support is more than 6 orders of magnitude compared to that of suspended graphene in air.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The electronic properties of graphene
Castro Neto, A. H., Guinea, F., Peres, N. M. R., Novoselov, K. S., & Geim, A. K. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.109 · Cited by 24,803
Self-citationGraphene-based composite materials
Stankovich, S., Dikin, D. A., Dommett, G. H. B., Kohlhaas, K. M., Zimney, E. J., Stach, E. A., Piner, R. D., Nguyen, S. T., & Ruoff, R. S. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04969 · Cited by 12,922
Cited by
Raman spectroscopy of graphene-based materials and its applications in related devices
Wu, J.-B., Lin, M.-L., Cong, X., Liu, H.-N., & Tan, P.-H. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00915h · Cited by 2,092
The mechanics of graphene nanocomposites: A review
Young, R. J., Kinloch, I. A., Gong, L., & Novoselov, K. S. (2012) · Composites Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.005 · Cited by 1,294
Self-citationRaman spectroscopy of carbon materials and their composites: Graphene, nanotubes and fibres
Li, Z., Deng, L., Kinloch, I. A., & Young, R. J. (2023) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101089 · Cited by 1,117
Negative Thermal Expansion Coefficient of Graphene Measured by Raman Spectroscopy
Yoon, D., Son, Y.-W., & Cheong, H. (2011) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl201488g · Cited by 1,076
Enhancing Electrocatalytic Water Splitting by Strain Engineering
You, B., Tang, M. T., Tsai, C., Abild‐Pedersen, F., Zheng, X., & Li, H. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201807001 · Cited by 793
Metadata
- Authors
- Frank, O., Tsoukleri, G., Parthenios, J., Papagelis, K., Riaz, I., Jalil, R., Novoselov, K. S., & Galiotis, C.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-05-24
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3131-3138
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2088292284
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.