The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chemical Distribution and Bonding of Lithium in Intercalated Graphite: Identification with Optimized Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy
Open accessAbstract
Direct mapping of the lithium spatial distribution and the chemical state provides critical information on structure-correlated lithium transport in electrode materials for lithium batteries. Nevertheless, probing lithium, the lightest solid element in the periodic table, poses an extreme challenge with traditional X-ray or electron scattering techniques due to its weak scattering power and vulnerability to radiation damage. Here, we report nanoscale maps of the lithium spatial distribution in electrochemically lithiated graphite using electron energy loss spectroscopy in the transmission electron microscope under optimized experimental conditions. The electronic structure of the discharged graphite was obtained from the near-edge fine structure of the Li and C K-edges and ab initio calculations. A 2.7 eV chemical shift of the Li K-edge, along with changes in the density of states, reveals the ionic nature of the intercalated lithium with significant charge transfer to the graphene sheets. Direct mapping of lithium in graphite revealed nanoscale inhomogeneities (nonstoichiometric regions), which are correlated with local phase separation and structural disorder (i.e., lattice distortion and dislocations) as observed by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. The surface solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer was also imaged and determined to have a thickness of 10-50 nm, covering both edge and basal planes with LiF as its primary inorganic component. The Li K-edge spectroscopy and mapping, combined with electron microscopy-based structural analysis provide a comprehensive view of the structure-correlated lithium intercalation in graphite and of the formation of the SEI layer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Electrolytes and Interphases in Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Xu, K. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500003w · Cited by 5,566
Atomic structure of sensitive battery materials and interfaces revealed by cryo–electron microscopy
Li, Y., Li, Y., Pei, A., Yan, K., Sun, Y., Wu, C.-L., Joubert, L.-M., Chin, R., Koh, A. L., Yu, Y., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam6014 · Cited by 1,547
Recent Progress in Electrode Materials for Sodium‐Ion Batteries
Kim, H., Kim, H., Ding, Z., Lee, M. H., Lim, K., Yoon, G., & Kang, K. (2016) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201600943 · Cited by 986
Ionic modulation and ionic coupling effects in MoS2 devices for neuromorphic computing
Zhu, X., Li, D., Liang, X., & Lu, W. D. (2019) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-018-0248-5 · Cited by 640
Gao, Y., Rojas, T., Wang, K., Liu, S., Wang, D., Chen, T., Wang, H., Ngo, A. T., & Wang, D. (2020) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-020-0640-7 · Cited by 471
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, F., Graetz, J., Moreno, M. S., Ma, C., Wu, L., Volkov, V., & Zhu, Y.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-01-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1190-1197
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2124733704
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemical Distribution and Bonding of Lithium in Intercalated Graphite: Identification with Optimized Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/nn1028168
- The paper
- Wang, F., Graetz, J., Moreno, M. S., Ma, C., Wu, L., Volkov, V., & Zhu, Y. (2011). Chemical Distribution and Bonding of Lithium in Intercalated Graphite: Identification with Optimized Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn1028168
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.