The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Systematic Evaluation of Nanomaterial Toxicity: Utility of Standardized Materials and Rapid Assays
Open accessAbstract
The challenge of optimizing both performance and safety in nanomaterials hinges on our ability to resolve which structural features lead to desired properties. It has been difficult to draw meaningful conclusions about biological impacts from many studies of nanomaterials due to the lack of nanomaterial characterization, unknown purity, and/or alteration of the nanomaterials by the biological environment. To investigate the relative influence of core size, surface chemistry, and charge on nanomaterial toxicity, we tested the biological response of whole animals exposed to a matrix of nine structurally diverse, precision-engineered gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) of high purity and known composition. Members of the matrix include three core sizes and four unique surface coatings that include positively and negatively charged headgroups. Mortality, malformations, uptake, and elimination of AuNPs were all dependent on these parameters, showing the need for tightly controlled experimental design and nanomaterial characterization. Results presented herein illustrate the value of an integrated approach to identify design rules that minimize potential hazard.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hühn, D., Kantner, K., Geidel, C., Brandholt, S., De Cock, I., Soenen, S. J. H., Rivera_Gil, P., Montenegro, J.-M., Braeckmans, K., Müllen, K., et al. (2013) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn3059295 · Cited by 580
Zebrafish: A complete animal model to enumerate the nanoparticle toxicity
Chakraborty, C., Sharma, A. R., Sharma, G., & Lee, S.-S. (2016) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-016-0217-6 · Cited by 297
Gilbertson, L. M., Zimmerman, J. B., Plata, D. L., Hutchison, J. E., & Anastas, P. T. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00445k · Cited by 275
Self-citationApplication of Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery
(2014) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/57028 · Cited by 266
Ranking of Heterogeneous Catalysts Metals by Their Greenness
Bystrzanowska, M., Petkov, P., & Tobiszewski, M. (2019) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04230 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Harper, S. L., Carriere, J. L., Miller, J. M., Hutchison, J. E., Maddux, B. L. S., & Tanguay, R. L.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-06-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 4688-4697
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W1984364967
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.