Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 217

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Defect-like Structures of Graphene on Copper Foils for Strain Relief Investigated by High-Resolution Scanning Tunneling Microscopy

Zhang, Yanfeng, Gao, Teng, Gao, Yabo, Xie, Shubao, Ji, Qingqing, Yan, Kai, Peng, Hailin, Liu, Zhongfan·2011·ACS Nano

Abstract

Understanding of the continuity and the microscopic structure of as-grown graphene on Cu foils through the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method is of fundamental significance for optimizing the growth parameters toward high-quality graphene. Because of the corrugated nature of the Cu foil surface, few experimental efforts on this issue have been made so far. We present here a high-resolution scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) study of CVD graphene directly on Cu foils. Our work indicates that graphene can be grown with a perfect continuity extending over both crystalline and noncrystalline regions, highly suggestive of weak graphene-substrate interactions. Due to thermal expansion mismatch, defect-like wrinkles and ripples tend to evolve either along the boundaries of crystalline terraces or on noncrystalline areas for strain relief. Furthermore, the strain effect arising from the conforming of perfect two-dimensional graphene to the highly corrugated surface of Cu foils is found to induce local bonding configuration change of carbon from sp(2) to sp(3), evidenced by the formation of "three-for-six" lattices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nn200573v

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Y., Gao, T., Gao, Y., Xie, S., Ji, Q., Yan, K., Peng, H., & Liu, Z.
Venue
ACS Nano
Published
2011-04-25
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
4014-4022
ISSN
  • 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-086X
OpenAlex
W2314070094
Cited by
217
References
2
FWCI
12.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.