The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fine-Tuning the Degree of Stem Cell Polarization and Alignment on Ordered Arrays of High-Aspect-Ratio Nanopillars
Open accessAbstract
Nanobiomaterials are introducing new capabilities to coordinate cell selection, growth, morphology, and differentiation. Herein, we report that tuning the geometry of ordered arrays of nanopillars (NP) elicits specialized morphologies in adherent cells. Systematic analysis of the effects of the NP radius, height, and spacing reveals that stem cells assume either flattened, polarized, or stellate morphologies in direct response to interpillar spacing. Notably, on NPs of pitch near a critical spacing (d(crit) ≈ 2 μm for C3H10T1/2 cells), cells exhibit rounding of the cell body, pronounced polarization, and extension of narrow axon-like cell projections aligned with the square lattice of the NP array and extending hundreds of micrometers. Furthermore, increasing the NPs' aspect ratio from 12:1 to 50:1 to produce NPs with a corresponding reduction in the NP bending stiffness of 2 orders of magnitude amplified the cellular response and resulted in a previously unseen degree of cell polarization and alignment. The rapid morphological transformation is reproducible on surfaces that maintain key parameters of the NP geometry and spacing, is influenced by the cell seeding density, and persists for different stem cell lines and primary mesenchymal stem cells. The demonstrated ability to support various morphogenetic trends in stem cells by simply tuning the geometry of the NP substrates provides a stepping-stone for the future design of scaffolds where cellular morphology and alignment are crucial.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate
Discher, D. E., Janmey, P., & Wang, Y.-L. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1116995 · Cited by 6,382
Designing materials for biology and medicine
Langer, R., & Tirrell, D. A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02388 · Cited by 3,198
Exploring and Engineering the Cell Surface Interface
Stevens, M. M., & George, J. H. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1106587 · Cited by 2,607
Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions
Vogel, V., & Sheetz, M. (2006) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1890 · Cited by 2,328 · cited 1×
“Others have shown cell shape changes when adhesion site availability is defined by chemical patterning of 2D substrates.(5,11,15,31) We found that the extreme cell polarization and alignment observed in our study could not be replicated with 2D patterned adhesion sites that mimic the NP arrays and that the suspension…”
Background
Cited by
Wang, L., Wu, Y., Guo, B., & Ma, P. X. (2015) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b03644 · Cited by 381
Three-dimensional nano-biointerface as a new platform for guiding cell fate
Liu, X., & Wang, S. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60419e · Cited by 275
Xia, L., Lin, K., Jiang, X., Xu, Y., Zhang, M., Chang, J., & Zhang, Z. (2013) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/c3tb20945h · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Bucaro, M. A., Vasquez, Y., Hatton, B. D., & Aizenberg, J.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-06-26
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 6222-6230
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2319672903
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.