Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 890

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Two-Dimensional Boron Monolayer Sheets

Wu, Xiaojun, Dai, Jun, Zhao, Yu, Zhuo, Zhiwen, Yang, Jinlong, Zeng, Xiao Cheng·2012·ACS Nano

Abstract

Boron, a nearest-neighbor of carbon, is possibly the second element that can possess free-standing flat monolayer structures, evidenced by recent successful synthesis of single-walled and multiwalled boron nanotubes (MWBNTs). From an extensive structural search using the first-principles particle-swarm optimization (PSO) global algorithm, two boron monolayers (α(1)- and β(1)-sheet) are predicted to be the most stable α- and β-types of boron sheets, respectively. Both boron sheets possess greater cohesive energies than the state-of-the-art two-dimensional boron structures (by more than 60 meV/atom based on density functional theory calculation using PBE0 hybrid functional), that is, the α-sheet previously predicted by Tang and Ismail-Beigi and the g(1/8)- and g(2/15)-sheets (both belonging to the β-type) recently reported by Yakobson and co-workers. Moreover, the PBE0 calculation predicts that the α-sheet is a semiconductor, while the α(1)-, β(1)-, g(1/8)-, and g(2/15)-sheets are all metals. When two α(1) monolayers are stacked on top each other, the bilayer α(1)-sheet remains flat with an optimal interlayer distance of ~3.62 Å, which is close to the measured interlayer distance (~3.2 Å) in MWBNTs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nn302696v

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wu, X., Dai, J., Zhao, Y., Zhuo, Z., Yang, J., & Zeng, X. C.
Venue
ACS Nano
Published
2012-07-20
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
7443-7453
ISSN
  • 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-086X
OpenAlex
W2330394421
Cited by
890
References
8
FWCI
12.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.