The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Injection Routes on the Biodistribution, Clearance, and Tumor Uptake of Carbon Dots
Open accessAbstract
The emergence of photoluminescent carbon-based nanomaterials has shown exciting potential in the development of benign nanoprobes. However, the in vivo kinetic behaviors of these particles that are necessary for clinical translation are poorly understood to date. In this study, fluorescent carbon dots (C-dots) were synthesized and the effect of three injection routes on their fate in vivo was explored by using both near-infrared fluorescence and positron emission tomography imaging techniques. We found that C-dots are efficiently and rapidly excreted from the body after all three injection routes. The clearance rate of C-dots is ranked as intravenous > intramuscular > subcutaneous. The particles had relatively low retention in the reticuloendothelial system and showed high tumor-to-background contrast. Furthermore, different injection routes also resulted in different blood clearance patterns and tumor uptakes of C-dots. These results satisfy the need for clinical translation and should promote efforts to further investigate the possibility of using carbon-based nanoprobes in a clinical setting. More broadly, we provide a testing blueprint for in vivo behavior of nanoplatforms under various injection routes, an important step forward toward safety and efficacy analysis of nanoparticles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Renal clearance of quantum dots
Soo Choi, H., Liu, W., Misra, P., Tanaka, E., Zimmer, J. P., Itty Ipe, B., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1340 · Cited by 4,476
Second window for in vivo imaging
Smith, A. M., Mancini, M. C., & Nie, S. (2009) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.326 · Cited by 2,848
Welsher, K., Sherlock, S. P., & Dai, H. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1014501108 · Cited by 958
Design considerations for tumour-targeted nanoparticles
Choi, H. S., Liu, W., Liu, F., Nasr, K., Misra, P., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2010) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.314 · Cited by 754
Self-citation
Cited by
Carbon quantum dots and their applications
Lim, S. Y., Shen, W., & Gao, Z. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00269e · Cited by 4,976
Glowing Graphene Quantum Dots and Carbon Dots: Properties, Syntheses, and Biological Applications
Zheng, X. T., Ananthanarayanan, A., Luo, K. Q., & Chen, P. (2015) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201402648 · Cited by 2,190
Carbon Dots: A New Type of Carbon-Based Nanomaterial with Wide Applications
Liu, J., Li, R., & Yang, B. (2020) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.0c01306 · Cited by 1,936
Nanochemistry and Nanomedicine for Nanoparticle-based Diagnostics and Therapy
Chen, G., Roy, I., Yang, C., & Prasad, P. N. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00148 · Cited by 1,499
Carbon dots—Emerging light emitters for bioimaging, cancer therapy and optoelectronics
Hola, K., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Giannelis, E. P., Zboril, R., & Rogach, A. L. (2014) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2014.09.004 · Cited by 992
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, X., Zhang, F., Zhu, L., Choi, K. Y., Guo, N., Guo, J., Tackett, K., Anilkumar, P., Liu, G., Quan, Q., Choi, H. S., Niu, G., Sun, Y.-P., Lee, S., & Chen, X.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-06-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 5684-5693
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2000107770
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.