Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

HfO2 on MoS2 by Atomic Layer Deposition: Adsorption Mechanisms and Thickness Scalability

McDonnell, Stephen, Brennan, Barry, Azcatl, Angelica, Lu, Ning, Dong, Hong, Buie, Creighton, Kim, Jiyoung, Hinkle, Christopher L., Kim, Moon J., Wallace, Robert M.·2013·ACS Nano

Abstract

We report our investigation of the atomic layer deposition (ALD) of HfO2 on the MoS2 surface. In contrast to previous reports of conformal growth on MoS2 flakes, we find that ALD on MoS2 bulk material is not uniform. No covalent bonding between the HfO2 and MoS2 is detected. We highlight that individual precursors do not permanently adsorb on the clean MoS2 surface but that organic and solvent residues can dramatically change ALD nucleation behavior. We then posit that prior reports of conformal ALD deposition on MoS2 flakes that had been exposed to such organics and solvents likely rely on contamination-mediated nucleation. These results highlight that surface functionalization will be required before controllable and low defect density high-κ/MoS2 interfaces will be realized. The band structure of the HfO2/MoS2 system is experimentally derived with valence and conduction band offsets found to be 2.67 and 2.09 eV, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nn404775u

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 309

Metadata

Authors
McDonnell, S., Brennan, B., Azcatl, A., Lu, N., Dong, H., Buie, C., Kim, J., Hinkle, C. L., Kim, M. J., & Wallace, R. M.
Venue
ACS Nano
Published
2013-10-17
Volume
7
Issue
11
Pages
10354-10361
ISSN
  • 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-086X
OpenAlex
W1993711106
Cited by
309
References
2
FWCI
8.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.