The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Highly Effective Hydrogen Isotope Separation in Nanoporous Metal–Organic Frameworks with Open Metal Sites: Direct Measurement and Theoretical Analysis
Abstract
Separating gaseous mixtures that consist of very similar size is one of the critical issues in modern separation technology. Especially, the separation of the isotopes hydrogen and deuterium requires special efforts, even though these isotopes show a very large mass ratio. Conventionally, H/D separation can be realized through cryogenic distillation of the molecular species or the Girdler-sulfide process, which are among the most energy-intensive separation techniques in the chemical industry. However, costs can be significantly reduced by using highly mass-selective nanoporous sorbents. Here, we describe a hydrogen isotope separation strategy exploiting the strongly attractive open metal sites present in nanoporous metal-organic frameworks of the CPO-27 family (also referred to as MOF-74). A theoretical analysis predicts an outstanding hydrogen isotopologue separation at open metal sites due to isotopal effects, which has been directly observed through cryogenic thermal desorption spectroscopy. For H2/D2 separation of an equimolar mixture at 60 K, the selectivity of 12 is the highest value ever measured, and this methodology shows extremely high separation efficiencies even above 77 K. Our theoretical results imply also a high selectivity for HD/H2 separation at similar temperatures, and together with catalytically active sites, we propose a mechanism to produce D2 from HD/H2 mixtures with natural or enriched deuterium content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beenakker, J. J. M., Borman, V. D., & Krylov, S. Y. (1995) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/0009-2614(94)01372-3 · Cited by 285
Cai, J., Xing, Y., & Zhao, X. (2012) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c2ra01284g · Cited by 107
Dynamic Quantum Molecular Sieving Separation of D2 from H2–D2 Mixture with Nanoporous Materials
Niimura, S., Fujimori, T., Minami, D., Hattori, Y., Abrams, L., Corbin, D., Hata, K., & Kaneko, K. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja305809u · Cited by 76
Cited by
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Separation
Zhao, X., Wang, Y., Li, D., Bu, X., & Feng, P. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201705189 · Cited by 1,305
Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects
Pérez-Botella, E., Valencia, S., & Rey, F. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00140 · Cited by 1,126
Kökçam-Demir, Ü., Goldman, A., Esrafili, L., Gharib, M., Morsali, A., Weingart, O., & Janiak, C. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00609e · Cited by 895
Barely porous organic cages for hydrogen isotope separation
Liu, M., Zhang, L., Little, M. A., Kapil, V., Ceriotti, M., Yang, S., Ding, L., Holden, D. L., Balderas-Xicohténcatl, R., He, D., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax7427 · Cited by 399
Self-citationKapelewski, M. T., Runčevski, T., Tarver, J. D., Jiang, H. Z. H., Hurst, K. E., Parilla, P. A., Ayala, A., Gennett, T., FitzGerald, S. A., Brown, C. M., et al. (2018) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03276 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Oh, H., Savchenko, I., Mavrandonakis, A., Heine, T., & Hirscher, M.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-01-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 761-770
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2074840227
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.