The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dual-Targeting Upconversion Nanoprobes across the Blood–Brain Barrier for Magnetic Resonance/Fluorescence Imaging of Intracranial Glioblastoma
Abstract
Surgical resection, one of the main clinical treatments of intracranial glioblastoma, bears the potential risk of incomplete excision due to the inherent infiltrative character of the glioblastoma. To maximize the accuracy of surgical resection, the magnetic resonance (MR) and fluorescence imaging are widely used for the tumor preoperative diagnosis and intraoperative positioning. However, present commercial MR contrast agents and fluorescent dyes can only function for single mode of imaging and are subject to poor blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability and nontargeting-specificity, resulting in the apparent risks of inefficient diagnosis and resection of glioblastoma. Considering the unique MR/upconversion luminescence (UCL) bimodal imaging feature of upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs), herein, we have developed a dual-targeting nanoprobe (ANG/PEG-UCNPs) to cross the BBB, target the glioblastoma, and then function as a simultaneous MR/NIR-to-NIR UCL bimodal imaging agent, which showed a much enhanced imaging performance in comparison with the clinically used single MRI contrast (Gd-DTPA) and fluorescent dye (5-ALA). Moreover, their biocompatibility, especially to brains, was systematically assessed by the histological/hematological examination, indicating a negligible in vivo toxicity. As a proof-of-concept, the ANG/PEG-UCNPs hold the great potential in MR diagnosis and fluorescence positioning of glioblastoma for the efficient tumor surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stummer, W., Pichlmeier, U., Meinel, T., Wiestler, O. D., Zanella, F., & Reulen, H.-J. (2006) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70665-9 · Cited by 3,423
Cited by
Overcoming the Blood–Brain Barrier: The Role of Nanomaterials in Treating Neurological Diseases
Furtado, D., Björnmalm, M., Ayton, S., Bush, A. I., Kempe, K., & Caruso, F. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201801362 · Cited by 708
Yang, B., Chen, Y., & Shi, J. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201901778 · Cited by 601
Self-citationVersatile Types of Organic/Inorganic Nanohybrids: From Strategic Design to Biomedical Applications
Zhao, N., Yan, L., Zhao, X., Chen, X., Li, A., Zheng, D., Zhou, X., Dai, X., & Xu, F.-J. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00401 · Cited by 429
Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Bu, W., Cheng, C., Zuo, C., Xiao, Q., Sun, Y., Ni, D., Zhang, C., Liu, J., et al. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201500478 · Cited by 425
Self-citationWang, J., Tang, W., Yang, M., Yin, Y., Li, H., Hu, F., Tang, L., Ma, X., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120784 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Ni, D., Zhang, J., Bu, W., Xing, H., Han, F., Xiao, Q., Yao, Z., Chen, F., He, Q., Liu, J., Zhang, S., Fan, W., Zhou, L., Peng, W., & Shi, J.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-01-13
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1231-1242
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2017871983
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.