The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
HFT-T, a Targeting Nanoparticle, Enhances Specific Delivery of Paclitaxel to Folate Receptor-Positive Tumors
Open accessAbstract
Nonspecific distribution of chemotherapeutic drugs (such as paclitaxel) is a major factor contributing to side effects and poor clinical outcomes in the treatment of human head and neck cancer. To develop novel drug delivery systems with enhanced efficacy and minimized adverse effects, we synthesized a ternary conjugate heparin-folic acid-paclitaxel (HFT), loaded with additional paclitaxel (T). The resulting nanoparticle, HFT-T, is expected to retain the antitumor activity of paclitaxel and specifically target folate receptor (FR)-expressing tumors, thereby increasing the bioavailability and efficacy of paclitaxel. In vitro experiments found that HFT-T selectively recognizes FR-positive human head and neck cancer cell line KB-3-1, displaying higher cytotoxicity compared to the free form of paclitaxel. In a subcutaneous KB-3-1 xenograft model, HFT-T administration enhanced the specific delivery of paclitaxel into tumor tissues and remarkably improved antitumor efficacy of paclitaxel. The average tumor volume in the HFT-T treatment group was 92.9 +/- 78.2 mm(3) vs 1670.3 +/- 286.1 mm(3) in the mice treated with free paclitaxel. Furthermore, paclitaxel tumors showed a resurgence of growth after several weeks of treatment, but this was not observed with HFT-T. This indicates that HFT-T could be more effective in preventing tumors from developing drug resistance. No significant acute in vivo toxicity was observed. These results indicate that specific delivery of paclitaxel with a ternary structured nanoparticle (HFT-T) targeting FR-positive tumor is a promising strategy to enhance chemotherapy efficacy and minimize adverse effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer
Davis, M. E., Chen, Z., & Shin, D. M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2614 · Cited by 4,233
Self-citationIn vivo evaluation of polymeric micellar paclitaxel formulation: toxicity and efficacy
Kim, S. C., Kim, D. W., Shim, Y. H., Bang, J. S., Oh, H. S., Kim, S. W., & Seo, M. H. (2001) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/s0168-3659(01)00275-9 · Cited by 734
Cited by
Strategies in the design of nanoparticles for therapeutic applications
Petros, R. A., & DeSimone, J. M. (2010) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2591 · Cited by 3,651
Targeted polymeric therapeutic nanoparticles: design, development and clinical translation
Kamaly, N., Xiao, Z., Valencia, P. M., Radovic-Moreno, A. F., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs15344k · Cited by 1,730
Nicolas, J., Mura, S., Brambilla, D., Mackiewicz, N., & Couvreur, P. (2013) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c2cs35265f · Cited by 1,270
Paclitaxel Nano-Delivery Systems: A Comprehensive Review
Ma, P. (2013) · Journal of Nanomedicine & Nanotechnology · doi:10.4172/2157-7439.1000164 · Cited by 559
Mechanisms of drug release in nanotherapeutic delivery systems
Wong, P. T., & Choi, S. K. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5004634 · Cited by 507
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, X., Li, J., Wang, Y., Cho, K. J., Kim, G., Gjyrezi, A., Koenig, L., Giannakakou, P., Shin, H. J. C., Tighiouart, M., Nie, S., Chen, Z. (., & Shin, D. M.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-09-17
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3165-3174
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2052078667
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.