The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhanced Mechanical Properties of Nanocomposites at Low Graphene Content
Abstract
In this study, the mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites with graphene platelets, single-walled carbon nanotubes, and multi-walled carbon nanotube additives were compared at a nanofiller weight fraction of 0.1 +/- 0.002%. The mechanical properties measured were the Young's modulus, ultimate tensile strength, fracture toughness, fracture energy, and the material's resistance to fatigue crack propagation. The results indicate that graphene platelets significantly out-perform carbon nanotube additives. The Young's modulus of the graphene nanocomposite was approximately 31% greater than the pristine epoxy as compared to approximately 3% increase for single-walled carbon nanotubes. The tensile strength of the baseline epoxy was enhanced by approximately 40% with graphene platelets compared to approximately 14% improvement for multi-walled carbon nanotubes. The mode I fracture toughness of the nanocomposite with graphene platelets showed approximately 53% increase over the epoxy compared to approximately 20% improvement for multi-walled carbon nanotubes. The fatigue resistance results also showed significantly different trends. While the fatigue suppression response of nanotube/epoxy composites degrades dramatically as the stress intensity factor amplitude is increased, the reverse effect is seen for graphene-based nanocomposites. The superiority of graphene platelets over carbon nanotubes in terms of mechanical properties enhancement may be related to their high specific surface area, enhanced nanofiller-matrix adhesion/interlocking arising from their wrinkled (rough) surface, as well as the two-dimensional (planar) geometry of graphene platelets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films
Novoselov, K. S., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V., Jiang, D., Zhang, Y., Dubonos, S. V., Grigorieva, I. V., & Firsov, A. A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1102896 · Cited by 66,834
Graphene-based composite materials
Stankovich, S., Dikin, D. A., Dommett, G. H. B., Kohlhaas, K. M., Zimney, E. J., Stach, E. A., Piner, R. D., Nguyen, S. T., & Ruoff, R. S. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04969 · Cited by 12,922
Cited by
Dispersion and functionalization of carbon nanotubes for polymer-based nanocomposites: A review
Ma, P.-C., Siddiqui, N. A., Marom, G., & Kim, J.-K. (2010) · Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.003 · Cited by 3,414
Graphene/Polymer Nanocomposites
Kim, H., Abdala, A. A., & Macosko, C. W. (2010) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma100572e · Cited by 3,406
Graphene-polymer nanocomposites for structural and functional applications
Hu, K., Kulkarni, D. D., Choi, I., & Tsukruk, V. V. (2014) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.03.001 · Cited by 1,085
Wan, Y.-J., Tang, L.-C., Gong, L.-X., Yan, D., Li, Y.-B., Wu, L.-B., Jiang, J.-X., & Lai, G.-Q. (2014) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2013.12.050 · Cited by 788
Polymer Nanocomposites—A Comparison between Carbon Nanotubes, Graphene, and Clay as Nanofillers
Bhattacharya, M. (2016) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma9040262 · Cited by 747
Metadata
- Authors
- Reif, J., Rafiee, J., Wang, Z., Song, H., Yu, Z.-Z., & Koratkar, N.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-12-03
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3884-3890
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2000105557
- Cited by
- 2,890
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 31.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced Mechanical Properties of Nanocomposites at Low Graphene Content. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/nn9010472
- The paper
- Reif, J., Rafiee, J., Wang, Z., Song, H., Yu, Z.-Z., & Koratkar, N. (2009). Enhanced Mechanical Properties of Nanocomposites at Low Graphene Content. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn9010472
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.