The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developing a Drug-like Natural Product Library
Abstract
Addressing drug-like/lead-like properties of biologically active small molecules early in a lead generation program is the current paradigm within the drug discovery community. Lipinski's "rule of five" has become the most commonly used tool to assess the relationship between structures and drug-like properties. Sixty percent of the 126 140 unique compounds in The Dictionary of Natural Products had no violations of Lipinski's "rule of five". We have isolated 814 natural products based on their expected drug-like/lead-like properties to generate a natural product library (NPL) in which 85% of the isolated compounds had no Lipinski violations. The library demonstrates the feasibility of obtaining natural products known for rich chemical diversity with the required physicochemical properties for drug discovery. The knowledge generated in creation of the library of structurally characterized pure natural products may provide opportunities to front-load lead-like property space in natural product drug discovery programs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Natural products as sources of new drugs over the last 25 years
Newman, D. J., & Cragg, G. M. (2007) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/np068054v · Cited by 5,517
Natural products as sources of new drugs over the period 1981–2002
Newman, D. J., Cragg, G. M., & Snader, K. M. (2003) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/np030096l · Cited by 3,082
Cited by
Faulkner, D. J. (1990) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/np9900700269 · Cited by 4,866
The re-emergence of natural products for drug discovery in the genomics era
Harvey, A. L., Edrada-Ebel, R., & Quinn, R. J. (2015) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4510 · Cited by 2,572
Self-citationCounting on natural products for drug design
Rodrigues, T., Reker, D., Schneider, P., & Schneider, G. (2016) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.2479 · Cited by 1,250
Modern Natural Products Drug Discovery and Its Relevance to Biodiversity Conservation
Kingston, D. G. I. (2011) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/np100550t · Cited by 516
Review on natural products databases: where to find data in 2020
Sorokina, M., & Steinbeck, C. (2020) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-020-00424-9 · Cited by 485
Metadata
- Authors
- Quinn, R. J., Carroll, A. R., Pham, N. B., Baron, P., Palframan, M. E., Suraweera, L., Pierens, G. K., & Muresan, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Natural Products
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-02-08
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 464-468
- ISSN
- 0163-3864 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6025
- OpenAlex
- W1969053334
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developing a Drug-like Natural Product Library. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/np070526y
- The paper
- Quinn, R. J., Carroll, A. R., Pham, N. B., Baron, P., Palframan, M. E., Suraweera, L., Pierens, G. K., & Muresan, S. (2008). Developing a Drug-like Natural Product Library. Journal of Natural Products. https://doi.org/10.1021/np070526y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.