The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 114 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review on natural products databases: where to find data in 2020
Open accessAbstract
Natural products (NPs) have been the centre of attention of the scientific community in the last decencies and the interest around them continues to grow incessantly. As a consequence, in the last 20 years, there was a rapid multiplication of various databases and collections as generalistic or thematic resources for NP information. In this review, we establish a complete overview of these resources, and the numbers are overwhelming: over 120 different NP databases and collections were published and re-used since 2000. 98 of them are still somehow accessible and only 50 are open access. The latter include not only databases but also big collections of NPs published as supplementary material in scientific publications and collections that were backed up in the ZINC database for commercially-available compounds. Some databases, even published relatively recently are already not accessible anymore, which leads to a dramatic loss of data on NPs. The data sources are presented in this manuscript, together with the comparison of the content of open ones. With this review, we also compiled the open-access natural compounds in one single dataset a COlleCtion of Open NatUral producTs (COCONUT), which is available on Zenodo and contains structures and sparse annotations for over 400,000 non-redundant NPs, which makes it the biggest open collection of NPs available to this date.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., et al. (2016) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18 · Cited by 18,423
KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs
Kanehisa, M., Furumichi, M., Tanabe, M., Sato, Y., & Morishima, K. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1092 · Cited by 8,865
DrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018
Wishart, D. S., Feunang, Y. D., Guo, A. C., Lo, E. J., Marcu, A., Grant, J. R., Sajed, T., Johnson, D., Li, C., Sayeeda, Z., et al. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1037 · Cited by 8,404
UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebase
Apweiler, R. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh131 · Cited by 7,498
Natural products as sources of new drugs from 1981 to 2014
Newman, D. J., & Cragg, G. M. (2016) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b01055 · Cited by 5,858
TCMSP: a database of systems pharmacology for drug discovery from herbal medicines
Ru, J., Li, P., Wang, J., Zhou, W., Li, B., Huang, C., Li, P., Guo, Z., Tao, W., Yang, Y., et al. (2014) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/1758-2946-6-13 · Cited by 5,038
Faulkner, D. J. (1990) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/np9900700269 · Cited by 4,866
Wang, M., Carver, J. J., Phelan, V. V., Sanchez, L. M., Garg, N., Peng, Y., Nguyen, D. D., Watrous, J., Kapono, C. A., Luzzatto-Knaan, T., et al. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3597 · Cited by 4,629
HMDB 4.0: the human metabolome database for 2018
Wishart, D. S., Feunang, Y. D., Marcu, A., Guo, A. C., Liang, K., Vázquez-Fresno, R., Sajed, T., Johnson, D., Li, C., Karu, N., et al. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1089 · Cited by 3,438
ZINC 15 – Ligand Discovery for Everyone
Sterling, T., & Irwin, J. J. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00559 · Cited by 3,224
Cited by
The LOTUS initiative for open knowledge management in natural products research
Rutz, A., Sorokina, M., Galgonek, J., Mietchen, D., Willighagen, E., Gaudry, A., Graham, J. G., Stephan, R., Page, R., Vondrášek, J., et al. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.70780 · Cited by 429
Self-citationNew software tools, databases, and resources in metabolomics: updates from 2020
Misra, B. B. (2021) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-021-01796-1 · Cited by 227
MSNovelist: de novo structure generation from mass spectra
Stravs, M. A., Dührkop, K., Böcker, S., & Zamboni, N. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01486-3 · Cited by 226
Effectiveness of molecular fingerprints for exploring the chemical space of natural products
Boldini, D., Ballabio, D., Consonni, V., Todeschini, R., Grisoni, F., & Sieber, S. A. (2024) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-024-00830-3 · Cited by 97
Open data and algorithms for open science in AI-driven molecular informatics
Brinkhaus, H. O., Rajan, K., Schaub, J., Zielesny, A., & Steinbeck, C. (2023) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102542 · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sorokina, M., & Steinbeck, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Cheminformatics
- Published
- 2020-04-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-20
- ISSN
- 1758-2946 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3030363843
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 114
- FWCI
- 32.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review on natural products databases: where to find data in 2020. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13321-020-00424-9
- The paper
- Sorokina, M., & Steinbeck, C. (2020). Review on natural products databases: where to find data in 2020. Journal of Cheminformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-020-00424-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
