The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Modern Look at Folkloric Use of Anti-infective Agents
Abstract
Infectious diseases are of ancient origin, and mankind has a venerable history of use of higher plant extracts for the therapy of such infections. Some such agents survive in use from earlier times--quinine, emetine, and sanguinarine, for example--but the modern use of fermentation-based antibiotics has greatly overshadowed work on agents from other sources. After a brief review of the present status of the field of antibiotics, this review focuses upon the present status of antimicrobial agents from higher plants with particular reference to agents from plants with a folkloric reputation for treatment of infections. In particular, recent work on the tropical genus Erythrina is emphasized. The use of modern microbiological techniques demonstrates that higher plants frequently exhibit significant potency against human bacterial and fungal pathogens, that many genera are involved, that many folkloric uses can be rationalized on this basis, that the active constituents are readily isolated by bioassay-directed techniques, that their chemical structures are types uncommon amongst fermentation-based agents but are familiar to natural product chemists, that their antimicrobial spectra are comparatively narrow but that their potency is often reasonable, that they are comparatively easy to synthesize and the unnatural analogues so produced can possess enhanced therapeutic potential and, thus, it is concluded that such work generates a gratifying number of novel lead structures and that the possibility of finding additional agents for human or agricultural use based upon higher plant agents is realistic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and other plant extracts
Hammer, K. A., Carson, C. F., & Riley, T. V. (1999) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00780.x · Cited by 2,560
Screening methods for natural products with antimicrobial activity: A review of the literature
Rios, J. L., Recio, M. C., & Villar, A. (1988) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/0378-8741(88)90001-3 · Cited by 835
Antimicrobial activity and total content of polyphenols of Rheum L. species growing in Poland
Kosikowska, U., Smolarz, H., & Malm, A. (2010) · Open Life Sciences · doi:10.2478/s11535-010-0067-4 · Cited by 31
Goze, I., Alim, A., Cetinus, S. A., Çetin, A., Durmus, N., Atas, A. T., & Vural, N. (2010) · Journal of Medicinal Food · doi:10.1089/jmf.2009.0094 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitscher, L. A., Drake, S., Gollapudi, S. R., & Okwute, S. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Natural Products
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1987-11
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1025-1040
- ISSN
- 0163-3864 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6025
- OpenAlex
- W2049247255
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Modern Look at Folkloric Use of Anti-infective Agents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/np50054a003
- The paper
- Mitscher, L. A., Drake, S., Gollapudi, S. R., & Okwute, S. K. (1987). A Modern Look at Folkloric Use of Anti-infective Agents. Journal of Natural Products. https://doi.org/10.1021/np50054a003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.