The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct Analysis and MALDI Imaging of Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Sections
Abstract
Formalin fixation, generally followed by paraffin embedding, is the standard and well-established processing method employed by pathologist. This treatment conserves and stabilizes biopsy samples for years. Analysis of FFPE tissues from biopsy libraries has been, so far, a challenge for proteomics biomarker studies. Herein, we present two methods for the direct analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues by MALDI-MS. The first is based on the use of a reactive matrix, 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine, useful for FFPE tissues stored less than 1 year. The second approach is applicable for all FFPE tissues regardless of conservation time. The strategy is based on in situ enzymatic digestion of the tissue section after paraffin removal. In situ digestion can be performed on a specific area of the tissue as well as on a very small area (microdigestion). Combining automated microdigestion of a predefined tissue array with either in situ extraction prior to classical nanoLC/MS-MS analysis or automated microspotting of MALDI matrix according to the same array allows the identification of both proteins by nanoLC-nanoESI and MALDI imaging. When adjacent tissue sections are used, it is, thus, possible to correlate protein identification and molecular imaging. These combined approaches, along with FFPE tissue analysis provide access to massive amounts of archived samples in the clinical pathology setting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Imaging of Biological Samples: Localization of Peptides and Proteins Using MALDI-TOF MS
Caprioli, R. M., Farmer, T. B., & Gile, J. (1997) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac970888i · Cited by 2,234
Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry of biopolymers.
Hillenkamp, F., Karas, M., Beavis, R. C., & Chait, B. T. (1991) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac00024a716 · Cited by 1,930
Cited by
MALDI imaging mass spectrometry: molecular snapshots of biochemical systems
Cornett, D. S., Reyzer, M. L., Chaurand, P., & Caprioli, R. M. (2007) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth1094 · Cited by 886
Norris, J. L., & Caprioli, R. M. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3004295 · Cited by 696
A concise review of mass spectrometry imaging
Amstalden van Hove, E. R., Smith, D. F., & Heeren, R. M. A. (2010) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2010.01.033 · Cited by 416
Mass spectrometry imaging with high resolution in mass and space
Römpp, A., & Spengler, B. (2013) · Histochemistry and Cell Biology · doi:10.1007/s00418-013-1097-6 · Cited by 358
Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Biomolecular Information
Spengler, B. (2015) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac504543v · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Lemaire, R., Desmons, A., Tabet, J. C., Day, R., Salzet, M., & Fournier, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Proteome Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-02-10
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1295-1305
- ISSN
- 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3907
- OpenAlex
- W2021966334
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct Analysis and MALDI Imaging of Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Sections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/pr060549i
- The paper
- Lemaire, R., Desmons, A., Tabet, J. C., Day, R., Salzet, M., & Fournier, I. (2007). Direct Analysis and MALDI Imaging of Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Sections. Journal of Proteome Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr060549i
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.