The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enrichment and Analysis of Nonenzymatically Glycated Peptides: Boronate Affinity Chromatography Coupled with Electron-Transfer Dissociation Mass Spectrometry
Open accessAbstract
Nonenzymatic glycation of peptides and proteins by d-glucose has important implications in the pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus, particularly in the development of diabetic complications. However, no effective high-throughput methods exist for identifying proteins containing this low-abundance post-translational modification in bottom-up proteomic studies. In this report, phenylboronate affinity chromatography was used in a two-step enrichment scheme to selectively isolate first glycated proteins and then glycated, tryptic peptides from human serum glycated in vitro. Enriched peptides were subsequently analyzed by alternating electron-transfer dissociation (ETD) and collision induced dissociation (CID) tandem mass spectrometry. ETD fragmentation mode permitted identification of a significantly higher number of glycated peptides (87.6% of all identified peptides) versus CID mode (17.0% of all identified peptides), when utilizing enrichment on first the protein and then the peptide level. This study illustrates that phenylboronate affinity chromatography coupled with LC-MS/MS and using ETD as the fragmentation mode is an efficient approach for analysis of glycated proteins and may have broad application in studies of diabetes mellitus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Peptide and protein sequence analysis by electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry
Syka, J. E. P., Coon, J. J., Schroeder, M. J., Shabanowitz, J., & Hunt, D. F. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0402700101 · Cited by 2,370
Ahmed, N., & Thornalley, P. J. (2003) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst0311417 · Cited by 152
Cited by
Li, D., Chen, Y., & Liu, Z. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00013k · Cited by 586
Zhang, Q., Ames, J. M., Smith, R. D., Baynes, J. W., & Metz, T. O. (2009) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr800858h · Cited by 421
Self-citationHigh-sensitivity Analytical Approaches for the Structural Characterization of Glycoproteins
Alley, W. R., Mann, B. F., & Novotny, M. V. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003714 · Cited by 310
Proteomic Identification of Carbonylated Proteins and Their Oxidation Sites
Madian, A. G., & Regnier, F. E. (2010) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr1002609 · Cited by 272
Developability Assessment During the Selection of Novel Therapeutic Antibodies
Jarasch, A., Koll, H., Regula, J. T., Bader, M., Papadimitriou, A., & Kettenberger, H. (2015) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.24430 · Cited by 242
Ashraf, J. M., Ahmad, S., Choi, I., Ahmad, N., Farhan, M., Tatyana, G., & Shahab, U. (2015) · IUBMB Life · doi:10.1002/iub.1450 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Q., Tang, N., Brock, J. W. C., Mottaz, H. M., Ames, J. M., Baynes, J. W., Smith, R. D., & Metz, T. O.
- Venue
- Journal of Proteome Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-05-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2323-2330
- ISSN
- 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3907
- OpenAlex
- W2047339078
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.