Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative Proteomics of Salt Tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and Thellungiella halophila

Pang, Qiuying, Chen, Sixue, Dai, Shaojun, Chen, Yazhou, Wang, Yang, Yan, Xiufeng·2010·Journal of Proteome Research

Abstract

Salinity is a major abiotic stress affecting plant cultivation and productivity. Thellungiella halophila is a halophyte and has been used as a model for studying plant salt tolerance. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of salinity tolerance will facilitate the generation of salt tolerant crops. Here we report comparative leaf proteomics of Arabidopsis, a glycophyte, and its close relative Thellungiella, a halophyte, under different salt stress conditions. Proteins from control and NaCl treated Arabidopsis and Thellungiella leaf samples were extracted and separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. A total of 88 protein spots from Arabidopsis gels and 37 protein spots from Thellungiella gels showed significant changes. Out of these spots, a total of 79 and 32 proteins were identified by mass spectrometry in Arabidopsis and Thellungiella, respectively. Most of the identified proteins were involved in photosynthesis, energy metabolism, and stress response in Arabidopsis and Thellungiella. As a complementary approach, isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ) LC-MS was used to identify crude microsomal proteins. A total of 31 and 32 differentially expressed proteins were identified in Arabidopsis and Thellungiella under salt treatment, respectively. Overall, there were more proteins changed in abundance in Arabidopsis than in Thellungiella. Distinct patterns of protein changes in the two species were observed. Collectively, this work represents the most extensive proteomic description of salinity responses of Arabidopsis and Thellungiella and has improved our knowledge of salt tolerance in glycophytes and halophytes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/pr100034f

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Pang, Q., Chen, S., Dai, S., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Yan, X.
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2010-04-19
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
2584-2599
ISSN
  • 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3907
OpenAlex
W2070662527
Cited by
299
References
3
FWCI
20.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Proteomics of Salt Tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and Thellungiella halophila. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/pr100034f
The paper
Pang, Q., Chen, S., Dai, S., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Yan, X. (2010). Comparative Proteomics of Salt Tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and Thellungiella halophila. Journal of Proteome Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr100034f

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.