Cited by 173Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Protein Identification Using Customized Protein Sequence Databases Derived from RNA-Seq Data

Open access
Wang, Xiaojing, Slebos, Robbert J. C., Wang, Dong, Halvey, Patrick J., Tabb, David L., Liebler, Daniel C., Zhang, Bing·2012·Journal of Proteome Research

Abstract

The standard shotgun proteomics data analysis strategy relies on searching MS/MS spectra against a context-independent protein sequence database derived from the complete genome sequence of an organism. Because transcriptome sequence analysis (RNA-Seq) promises an unbiased and comprehensive picture of the transcriptome, we reason that a sample-specific protein database derived from RNA-Seq data can better approximate the real protein pool in the sample and thus improve protein identification. In this study, we have developed a two-step strategy for building sample-specific protein databases from RNA-Seq data. First, the database size is reduced by eliminating unexpressed or lowly expressed genes according to transcript quantification. Second, high-quality nonsynonymous coding single nucleotide variations (SNVs) are identified based on RNA-Seq data, and corresponding protein variants are added to the database. Using RNA-Seq and shotgun proteomics data from two colorectal cancer cell lines SW480 and RKO, we demonstrated that customized protein sequence databases could significantly increase the sensitivity of peptide identification, reduce ambiguity in protein assembly, and enable the detection of known and novel peptide variants. Thus, sample-specific databases from RNA-Seq data can enable more sensitive and comprehensive protein discovery in shotgun proteomics studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/pr200766z

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RNA sequencing can build sample-specific proteoform databases that capture genetic variation and splicing patterns, allowing the strategy to be extended to mammalian genomes.

    “To extend the strategy to mammalian genomes, RNA sequencing can be used to construct sample-specific proteoform databases that capture the genetic variation and extent of splicing patterns in the sample (10, 11).”

    From Proteoforms as the next proteomics currency (2018) · cites this paper as [10]

  • There has been recent interest in leveraging RNA-seq sequence variants to improve peptide identification, resulting in basic software tools for integration.

    “Additionally, there has been some recent interest in leveraging sequence variants obtained from RNA-seq to improve peptide identification99,100, which have in turn resulted in the production of somewhat basic software tools for integration of such datasets101.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, X., Slebos, R. J. C., Wang, D., Halvey, P. J., Tabb, D. L., Liebler, D. C., & Zhang, B.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Bing
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2011-12-14
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
1009-1017
ISSN
  • 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3907
OpenAlex
W2042228684
Cited by
173
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Proteome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ca126218-05)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01-CA-126218, U24CA126479)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM088822)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
peptide identification, single nucleotide variants, protein variants, transcript quantification, lowly expressed genes, protein assembly, colorectal cancer cell lines, SW480 cells
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Base Sequence, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Peptide Mapping, Peptides, Proteins, RNA, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling, Databases, Protein, Cell Line, Tumor, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review