The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metabolic Profiling of Human Colorectal Cancer Using High-Resolution Magic Angle Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (HR-MAS NMR) Spectroscopy and Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)
Abstract
Current clinical strategy for staging and prognostication of colorectal cancer (CRC) relies mainly upon the TNM or Duke system. This clinicopathological stage is a crude prognostic guide because it reflects in part the delay in diagnosis in the case of an advanced cancer and gives little insight into the biological characteristics of the tumor. We hypothesized that global metabolic profiling (metabonomics/metabolomics) of colon mucosae would define metabolic signatures that not only discriminate malignant from normal mucosae, but also could distinguish the anatomical and clinicopathological characteristics of CRC. We applied both high-resolution magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (HR-MAS NMR) and gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC/MS) to analyze metabolites in biopsied colorectal tumors and their matched normal mucosae obtained from 31 CRC patients. Orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) models generated from metabolic profiles obtained by both analytical approaches could robustly discriminate normal from malignant samples (Q(2) > 0.50, Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) AUC >0.95, using 7-fold cross validation). A total of 31 marker metabolites were identified using the two analytical platforms. The majority of these metabolites were associated with expected metabolic perturbations in CRC including elevated tissue hypoxia, glycolysis, nucleotide biosynthesis, lipid metabolism, inflammation and steroid metabolism. OPLS-DA models showed that the metabolite profiles obtained via HR-MAS NMR could further differentiate colon from rectal cancers (Q(2)> 0.60, ROC AUC = 1.00, using 7-fold cross validation). These data suggest that metabolic profiling of CRC mucosae could provide new phenotypic biomarkers for CRC management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ribic, C. M., Sargent, D. J., Moore, M. J., Thibodeau, S. N., French, A. J., Goldberg, R. M., Hamilton, S. R., Laurent-Puig, P., Gryfe, R., Shepherd, L. E., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022289 · Cited by 2,160
Atherton, H. J., Bailey, N. J., Zhang, W., Taylor, J., Major, H., Shockcor, J., Clarke, K., & Griffin, J. L. (2006) · Physiological Genomics · doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00060.2006 · Cited by 159
Martin, F.-P. J., Wang, Y., Sprenger, N., Holmes, E., Lindon, J. C., Kochhar, S., & Nicholson, J. K. (2007) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr060596a · Cited by 87
Self-citation
Cited by
Metabolic Pathways Regulating Colorectal Cancer Initiation and Progression
La Vecchia, S., & Sebastián, C. (2020) · Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.05.018 · Cited by 349
Serum and Urine Metabolite Profiling Reveals Potential Biomarkers of Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Chen, T., Xie, G., Wang, X., Fan, J., Qiu, Y., Zheng, X., Qi, X., Cao, Y., Su, M., Wang, X., et al. (2011) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m110.004945 · Cited by 357
Backshall, A., Alferez, D., Teichert, F., Wilson, I. D., Wilkinson, R. W., Goodlad, R. A., & Keun, H. C. (2009) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr800793w · Cited by 42
Self-citationComputational Approaches in Theranostics: Mining and Predicting Cancer Data
Cova, T. F. G. G., Bento, D. J., & Nunes, S. C. C. (2019) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics11030119 · Cited by 32
Kim, K., Yang, J., Kwack, S. J., Kim, H. S., Ryu, D. H., Kim, Y., Bae, J. Y., Lim, D. S., Choi, S. M., Kwon, M. J., et al. (2013) · Journal of Applied Toxicology · doi:10.1002/jat.2778 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Chan, E. C. Y., Koh, P. K., Mal, M., Cheah, P. Y., Eu, K. W., Backshall, A., Cavill, R., Nicholson, J. K., & Keun, H. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Proteome Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-12-08
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 352-361
- ISSN
- 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3907
- OpenAlex
- W2085317787
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.