The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping the Phosphorylation Sites of Ulk1
Abstract
Ulk1 is a serine/threonine kinase that controls macroautophagy, an essential homeostatic recycling pathway that degrades bulk cytoplasmic material and directs the turnover of organelles such as peroxisomes and mitochondria. Further, macroautophagy is potently induced by signals that trigger metabolic stress, such as hypoxia and amino acid starvation, where its recycling functions provide macromolecules necessary to maintain catabolic metabolism and cell survival. Substrates for Ulk1 have not been identified, and little is known regarding post-translational control of Ulk1 kinase activity and function. To gain insights into the regulatory mechanisms of Ulk1, we developed a robust purification protocol for Ulk1 and demonstrated that Ulk1 is highly phosphorylated and requires autophosphorylation for stability. Importantly, high-resolution, tandem mass spectrometry identified multiple sites of phosphorylation on Ulk1, including several within domains known to regulate macroautophagy. Differential phosphorylation analyses also identified sites of phosphorylation in the C-terminal domain that depend upon or require Ulk1 autophosphorylation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“that ULK1 autophosphorylates and transphosphorylates its binding partners ATG13, RB1CC1, and ATG101 [644, 645, 692-700].”
From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [697]
Citations
Cites
Impairment of starvation-induced and constitutive autophagy in Atg7 -deficient mice
Komatsu, M., Waguri, S., Ueno, T., Iwata, J., Murata, S., Tanida, I., Ezaki, J., Mizushima, N., Ohsumi, Y., Uchiyama, Y., et al. (2005) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200412022 · Cited by 2,331
Promotion of tumorigenesis by heterozygous disruption of the beclin 1 autophagy gene
Qu, X., Yu, J., Bhagat, G., Furuya, N., Hibshoosh, H., Troxel, A., Rosen, J., Eskelinen, E.-L., Mizushima, N., Ohsumi, Y., et al. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci20039 · Cited by 2,311
Yue, Z., Jin, S., Yang, C., Levine, A. J., & Heintz, N. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2436255100 · Cited by 2,116
Nutrient-dependent mTORC1 Association with the ULK1–Atg13–FIP200 Complex Required for Autophagy
Hosokawa, N., Hara, T., Kaizuka, T., Kishi, C., Takamura, A., Miura, Y., Iemura, S.-I., Natsume, T., Takehana, K., Yamada, N., et al. (2009) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e08-12-1248 · Cited by 2,076
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- Xie Z., 2007, Nat. Cell Biol., 9, 1102, 10.1038/ncb1007-1102 · DOI
- Kourtis N., 2009, Cell Death Differ., 16, 21, 10.1038/cdd.2008.120 · DOI
- Tsukada M., 1993, FEBS Lett., 333, 169, 10.1016/0014-5793(93)80398-E · DOI
- Kamada Y., 2000, J. Cell Biol., 150, 1507, 10.1083/jcb.150.6.1507 · DOI · Paper page
- Matsuura A., 1997, Gene, 192, 245, 10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00084-X · DOI
- Funakoshi T., 1997, Gene, 192, 207, 10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00031-0 · DOI
- Kim J., 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 763, 10.1074/jbc.M109134200 · DOI · Paper page
- Suzuki K., 2001, EMBO J., 20, 5971, 10.1093/emboj/20.21.5971 · DOI
- Cheong H., 2008, Mol. Biol. Cell, 19, 668, 10.1091/mbc.e07-08-0826 · DOI · Paper page
- Budovskaya Y. V., 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 102, 13933, 10.1073/pnas.0501046102 · DOI
- Chan E. Y., 2009, Autophagy, 5, 758, 10.4161/auto.8709 · DOI · Paper page
- Kuroyanagi H., 1998, Genomics, 51, 76, 10.1006/geno.1998.5340 · DOI
- Yan J., 1998, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 246, 222, 10.1006/bbrc.1998.8546 · DOI
- Chan E. Y., 2009, Mol. Cell. Biol., 29, 157, 10.1128/MCB.01082-08 · DOI · Paper page
- Chan E. Y., 2007, J. Biol. Chem., 282, 25464, 10.1074/jbc.M703663200 · DOI · Paper page
- Young A. R., 2006, J. Cell Sci., 119, 3888, 10.1242/jcs.03172 · DOI · Paper page
- Schweers R. L., 2007, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 104, 19500, 10.1073/pnas.0708818104 · DOI
- Zhang J., 2009, Blood
- Kundu M., 2008, Blood, 112, 1493, 10.1182/blood-2008-02-137398 · DOI
- Kuma A., 2004, Nature, 432, 1032, 10.1038/nature03029 · DOI · Paper page
- Ganley I. G., 2009, J. Biol. Chem., 284, 12297, 10.1074/jbc.M900573200 · DOI · Paper page
- Jung C. H., 2009, Mol. Biol. Cell, 20, 1992, 10.1091/mbc.e08-12-1249 · DOI · Paper page
- Hara T., 2008, J. Cell Biol., 181, 497, 10.1083/jcb.200712064 · DOI · Paper page
- Purvine S., 2004, OMICS, 8, 255, 10.1089/omi.2004.8.255 · DOI
- Kersey P. J., 2004, Proteomics, 4, 1985, 10.1002/pmic.200300721 · DOI
- Hanks S. K., 1995, FASEB J., 9, 576, 10.1096/fasebj.9.8.7768349 · DOI
- Johnson L. N., 1998, FEBS Lett., 430, 1, 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00606-1 · DOI
- Madhusudan, Trafny E. A., 1994, Protein Sci., 3, 176, 10.1002/pro.5560030203 · DOI
- Zheng J., 1993, Protein Sci., 2, 1559, 10.1002/pro.5560021003 · DOI
- Lochhead P. A., 2009, Sci. Signal, 2, pe4, 10.1126/scisignal.254pe4 · DOI
- Okazaki N., 2000, Brain Res Mol Brain Res, 85, 1, 10.1016/S0169-328X(00)00218-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Tanida I., 2004, Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol., 36, 2503, 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.05.009 · DOI
- Miller M. L., 2008, Sci Signal., 1, ra2, 10.1126/scisignal.1159433 · DOI
- Budovskaya Y. V., 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 20663, 10.1074/jbc.M400272200 · DOI
- Furuta S., 2004, Oncogene, 23, 3898, 10.1038/sj.onc.1207539 · DOI
- Mavrakis M., 2006, Hum. Mol. Genet., 15, 2962, 10.1093/hmg/ddl239 · DOI
- Schmelzle T., 2004, Mol. Cell. Biol., 24, 338, 10.1128/MCB.24.1.338-351.2004 · DOI
- Abeliovich H., 2003, Mol. Biol. Cell, 14, 477, 10.1091/mbc.e02-07-0413 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition).
Klionsky, D. J., Abdelmohsen, K., Abe, A., Abedin, M. J., Abeliovich, H., Acevedo Arozena, A., Adachi, H., Adams, C. M., Adams, P. D., Adeli, K., et al. (2016) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356 · Cited by 5,894
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1
Klionsky, D. J., Abdel-Aziz, A. K., Abdelfatah, S., Abdellatif, M., Abdoli, A., Abel, S., Abeliovich, H., Abildgaard, M. H., Abudu, Y. P., Acevedo-Arozena, A., et al. (2021) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280 · Cited by 2,897
Jung, C. H., Ro, S.-H., Cao, J., Otto, N. M., & Kim, D.-H. (2010) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2010.01.017 · Cited by 2,090
Role of AMPK-mTOR-Ulk1/2 in the regulation of autophagy: cross talk, shortcuts, and feedbacks
Alers, S., Löffler, A. S., Wesselborg, S., & Stork, B. (2012) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.06159-11 · Cited by 1,483
Metadata
- Authors
- Dorsey, F. C., Rose, K. L., Coenen, S., Prater, S. M., Cavett, V., Cleveland, J. L., & Caldwell-Busby, J.
- Affiliations
- Departments of Cancer Biology and Molecular Therapeutics and The Translational Research Institute, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, Florida 33458, and Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
- Venue
- Journal of Proteome Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-10-19
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 5253-5263
- ISSN
- 1535-3893
- 1535-3907
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review