Cited by 72

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mapping the Phosphorylation Sites of Ulk1

Dorsey, Frank C., Rose, Kristie L., Coenen, Silvia, Prater, Stephanie M., Cavett, Valerie, Cleveland, John L., Caldwell-Busby, Jennifer·2009·Journal of Proteome Research

Abstract

Ulk1 is a serine/threonine kinase that controls macroautophagy, an essential homeostatic recycling pathway that degrades bulk cytoplasmic material and directs the turnover of organelles such as peroxisomes and mitochondria. Further, macroautophagy is potently induced by signals that trigger metabolic stress, such as hypoxia and amino acid starvation, where its recycling functions provide macromolecules necessary to maintain catabolic metabolism and cell survival. Substrates for Ulk1 have not been identified, and little is known regarding post-translational control of Ulk1 kinase activity and function. To gain insights into the regulatory mechanisms of Ulk1, we developed a robust purification protocol for Ulk1 and demonstrated that Ulk1 is highly phosphorylated and requires autophosphorylation for stability. Importantly, high-resolution, tandem mass spectrometry identified multiple sites of phosphorylation on Ulk1, including several within domains known to regulate macroautophagy. Differential phosphorylation analyses also identified sites of phosphorylation in the C-terminal domain that depend upon or require Ulk1 autophosphorylation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/pr900583m

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Xie Z., 2007, Nat. Cell Biol., 9, 1102, 10.1038/ncb1007-1102 · DOI
  2. Kourtis N., 2009, Cell Death Differ., 16, 21, 10.1038/cdd.2008.120 · DOI
  3. Tsukada M., 1993, FEBS Lett., 333, 169, 10.1016/0014-5793(93)80398-E · DOI
  4. Kamada Y., 2000, J. Cell Biol., 150, 1507, 10.1083/jcb.150.6.1507 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Matsuura A., 1997, Gene, 192, 245, 10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00084-X · DOI
  6. Funakoshi T., 1997, Gene, 192, 207, 10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00031-0 · DOI
  7. Kim J., 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 763, 10.1074/jbc.M109134200 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Suzuki K., 2001, EMBO J., 20, 5971, 10.1093/emboj/20.21.5971 · DOI
  9. Cheong H., 2008, Mol. Biol. Cell, 19, 668, 10.1091/mbc.e07-08-0826 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Budovskaya Y. V., 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 102, 13933, 10.1073/pnas.0501046102 · DOI
  11. Chan E. Y., 2009, Autophagy, 5, 758, 10.4161/auto.8709 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Kuroyanagi H., 1998, Genomics, 51, 76, 10.1006/geno.1998.5340 · DOI
  13. Yan J., 1998, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 246, 222, 10.1006/bbrc.1998.8546 · DOI
  14. Chan E. Y., 2009, Mol. Cell. Biol., 29, 157, 10.1128/MCB.01082-08 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Chan E. Y., 2007, J. Biol. Chem., 282, 25464, 10.1074/jbc.M703663200 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Young A. R., 2006, J. Cell Sci., 119, 3888, 10.1242/jcs.03172 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Schweers R. L., 2007, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 104, 19500, 10.1073/pnas.0708818104 · DOI
  18. Zhang J., 2009, Blood
  19. Kundu M., 2008, Blood, 112, 1493, 10.1182/blood-2008-02-137398 · DOI
  20. Kuma A., 2004, Nature, 432, 1032, 10.1038/nature03029 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Ganley I. G., 2009, J. Biol. Chem., 284, 12297, 10.1074/jbc.M900573200 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Jung C. H., 2009, Mol. Biol. Cell, 20, 1992, 10.1091/mbc.e08-12-1249 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Hara T., 2008, J. Cell Biol., 181, 497, 10.1083/jcb.200712064 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Purvine S., 2004, OMICS, 8, 255, 10.1089/omi.2004.8.255 · DOI
  25. Kersey P. J., 2004, Proteomics, 4, 1985, 10.1002/pmic.200300721 · DOI
  26. Hanks S. K., 1995, FASEB J., 9, 576, 10.1096/fasebj.9.8.7768349 · DOI
  27. Johnson L. N., 1998, FEBS Lett., 430, 1, 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00606-1 · DOI
  28. Madhusudan, Trafny E. A., 1994, Protein Sci., 3, 176, 10.1002/pro.5560030203 · DOI
  29. Zheng J., 1993, Protein Sci., 2, 1559, 10.1002/pro.5560021003 · DOI
  30. Lochhead P. A., 2009, Sci. Signal, 2, pe4, 10.1126/scisignal.254pe4 · DOI
  31. Okazaki N., 2000, Brain Res Mol Brain Res, 85, 1, 10.1016/S0169-328X(00)00218-7 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Tanida I., 2004, Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol., 36, 2503, 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.05.009 · DOI
  33. Miller M. L., 2008, Sci Signal., 1, ra2, 10.1126/scisignal.1159433 · DOI
  34. Budovskaya Y. V., 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 20663, 10.1074/jbc.M400272200 · DOI
  35. Furuta S., 2004, Oncogene, 23, 3898, 10.1038/sj.onc.1207539 · DOI
  36. Mavrakis M., 2006, Hum. Mol. Genet., 15, 2962, 10.1093/hmg/ddl239 · DOI
  37. Schmelzle T., 2004, Mol. Cell. Biol., 24, 338, 10.1128/MCB.24.1.338-351.2004 · DOI
  38. Abeliovich H., 2003, Mol. Biol. Cell, 14, 477, 10.1091/mbc.e02-07-0413 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dorsey, F. C., Rose, K. L., Coenen, S., Prater, S. M., Cavett, V., Cleveland, J. L., & Caldwell-Busby, J.
Affiliations
Departments of Cancer Biology and Molecular Therapeutics and The Translational Research Institute, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, Florida 33458, and Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2009-10-19
Volume
8
Issue
11
Pages
5253-5263
ISSN
  • 1535-3893
  • 1535-3907
Cited by
72
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review