Cited by 904

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FIP200, a ULK-interacting protein, is required for autophagosome formation in mammalian cells

Hara, Taichi, Takamura, Akito, Kishi, Chieko, Iemura, Shun-ichiro, Natsume, Tohru, Guan, Jun-Lin, Mizushima, Noboru·2008·The Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

Autophagy is a membrane-mediated intracellular degradation system. The serine/threonine kinase Atg1 plays an essential role in autophagosome formation. However, the role of the mammalian Atg1 homologues UNC-51–like kinase (ULK) 1 and 2 are not yet well understood. We found that murine ULK1 and 2 localized to autophagic isolation membrane under starvation conditions. Kinase-dead alleles of ULK1 and 2 exerted a dominant-negative effect on autophagosome formation, suggesting that ULK kinase activity is important for autophagy. We next screened for ULK binding proteins and identified the focal adhesion kinase family interacting protein of 200 kD (FIP200), which regulates diverse cellular functions such as cell size, proliferation, and migration. We found that FIP200 was redistributed from the cytoplasm to the isolation membrane under starvation conditions. In FIP200-deficient cells, autophagy induction by various treatments was abolished, and both stability and phosphorylation of ULK1 were impaired. These results suggest that FIP200 is a novel mammalian autophagy factor that functions together with ULKs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.200712064

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. 2002, Mol. Biol. Cell., 13, 3178, 10.1091/mbc.e02-05-0295 · DOI
  2. 2003, Mol. Biol. Cell., 14, 477, 10.1091/mbc.e02-07-0413 · DOI
  3. 2004, Int. J. Mol. Med., 14, 583
  4. 2005, J. Cell Biol., 171, 603, 10.1083/jcb.200507002 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 2004, Trends Cell Biol., 14, 241, 10.1016/j.tcb.2004.03.011 · DOI
  6. 2007, J. Biol. Chem., 282, 25464, 10.1074/jbc.M703663200 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 2002, Oncogene., 21, 1295, 10.1038/sj.onc.1205178 · DOI
  8. 2002, Nat. Genet., 31, 285, 10.1038/ng911 · DOI
  9. 2006, Int. J. Mol. Med., 18, 425
  10. 2007, Autophagy., 4, 37
  11. 2005, Mol. Biol. Cell., 16, 3438, 10.1091/mbc.e04-10-0894 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 2008, Mol. Biol. Cell., 19, 668, 10.1091/mbc.e07-08-0826 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 2004, Trends Cell Biol., 14, 70, 10.1016/j.tcb.2003.12.002 · DOI
  14. 2007, Autophagy., 3, 667, 10.4161/auto.4771 · DOI
  15. 2005, J. Cell Biol., 170, 379, 10.1083/jcb.200411106 · DOI
  16. 2006, J. Cell Biol., 175, 121, 10.1083/jcb.200604129 · DOI
  17. 2006, Nature., 440, 631, 10.1038/nature04532 · DOI
  18. 2007, Cancer Cell., 12, 9, 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.05.008 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 2002, Plant Physiol., 129, 1181, 10.1104/pp.011024 · DOI
  20. 2002, Nature., 415, 180, 10.1038/415180a · DOI
  21. 2006, FEBS Lett., 580, 2623, 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.04.008 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 1995, Nature., 377, 539, 10.1038/377539a0 · DOI
  23. 2006, Trends Cell Biol., 16, 206, 10.1016/j.tcb.2006.02.002 · DOI
  24. 2005, Mol. Biol. Cell., 16, 2544, 10.1091/mbc.e04-08-0669 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 2007, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 356, 405, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.02.150 · DOI
  26. 2000, J. Cell Biol., 150, 1507, 10.1083/jcb.150.6.1507 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 2004, Nat. Cell Biol., 6, 1229, 10.1038/ncb1194 · DOI
  28. 2005, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 338, 1884, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.10.163 · DOI
  29. 2008, Mol. Biol. Cell, 10.1091/mbc.E07-10-1048 · DOI
  30. 2001, J. Cell Biol., 152, 51, 10.1083/jcb.152.1.51 · DOI
  31. 2001, J. Cell Biol., 153, 381, 10.1083/jcb.153.2.381 · DOI
  32. 2005, J. Cell Sci., 118, 7, 10.1242/jcs.01620 · DOI
  33. 2006, Nature., 441, 880, 10.1038/nature04723 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 2006, Nature., 440, 637, 10.1038/nature04670 · DOI
  35. 2004, Dev. Cell., 6, 463, 10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00099-1 · DOI
  36. 2007, Circ. Res., 100, 914, 10.1161/01.RES.0000261924.76669.36 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 2004, Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol., 36, 2445, 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.02.002 · DOI
  38. 2003, Science., 301, 1387, 10.1126/science.1087782 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 2005, Cancer Res., 65, 6676, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4142 · DOI
  40. 2007, Genes Dev., 21, 2861, 10.1101/gad.1599207 · DOI
  41. 2007, Annu. Rev. Nutr., 27, 19, 10.1146/annurev.nutr.27.061406.093749 · DOI
  42. 2001, J. Cell Biol., 152, 657, 10.1083/jcb.152.4.657 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 2002, Genes Cells., 7, 75, 10.1046/j.1356-9597.2001.00499.x · DOI
  44. 2002, Anal. Chem., 74, 4725, 10.1021/ac020018n · DOI
  45. 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 30198, 10.1074/jbc.M204736200 · DOI
  46. 1994, Genes Dev., 8, 2389, 10.1101/gad.8.20.2389 · DOI
  47. 1997, Genes Dev., 11, 1801, 10.1101/gad.11.14.1801 · DOI
  48. 2000, Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res., 85, 1, 10.1016/S0169-328X(00)00218-7 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 15621, 10.1074/jbc.M311139200 · DOI
  50. 2004, Dev. Cell., 6, 79, 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00402-7 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 2005, J. Cell Biol., 170, 1101, 10.1083/jcb.200504035 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 18384, 10.1074/jbc.M313561200 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 2004, Dev. Cell., 7, 167, 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.07.009 · DOI
  54. 2007, Curr. Biol., 17, 1, 10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.053 · DOI
  55. 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 25840, 10.1074/jbc.M002813200 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 2007, FEBS Lett., 581, 2156, 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.01.096 · DOI
  57. 2001, EMBO J., 20, 5971, 10.1093/emboj/20.21.5971 · DOI
  58. 2007, Genes Cells., 12, 209, 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2007.01050.x · DOI
  59. 2006, Eukaryot. Cell., 5, 1797, 10.1128/EC.00342-05 · DOI
  60. 1999, Neuron., 24, 833, 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81031-4 · DOI
  61. 2004, Genes Dev., 18, 541, 10.1101/gad.1151204 · DOI
  62. 2000, J. Cell Biol., 149, 423, 10.1083/jcb.149.2.423 · DOI
  63. 2006, Cell., 124, 471, 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.016 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 1998, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 246, 222, 10.1006/bbrc.1998.8546 · DOI
  65. 1999, Oncogene., 18, 5850, 10.1038/sj.onc.1202988 · DOI
  66. 2006, J. Cell Sci., 119, 3888, 10.1242/jcs.03172 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 2006, J. Cell Sci., 119, 259, 10.1242/jcs.02735 · DOI
  68. 2007, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 104, 5842, 10.1073/pnas.0701402104 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hara, T., Takamura, A., Kishi, C., Iemura, S.-I., Natsume, T., Guan, J.-L., & Mizushima, N.
Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan
  • 2Biological Information Research Center, National Institutes of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Kohtoh-ku, Tokyo 135-0064, Japan
  • 3Department of Internal Medicine-MMG, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Venue
The Journal of Cell Biology
Published
2008-04-28
Volume
181
Issue
3
Pages
497-510
ISSN
  • 1540-8140
  • 0021-9525
Cited by
904
References
10
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review