The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of Sensor Cysteines in Human Keap1 Modified by the Cancer Chemopreventive Agent Sulforaphane
Abstract
The chemopreventive agent sulforaphane is an isothiocyanate derived from cruciferous vegetables. Sulforaphane exerts cancer chemopreventive effects by inducing antioxidant/electrophile response element (ARE)-regulated phase 2 enzyme and antioxidant genes through activation of the transcription factor nuclear factor-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), which is regulated by the thiol-rich sensor protein Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1). Sulforaphane is an electrophile that can react with protein thiols to form thionoacyl adducts. We hypothesized that, like other electrophilic Nrf2 activators, sulforaphane activates this system through specific modifications of the Keap1 protein. However, thionoacyl adducts are labile to hydrolysis and transacylation reactions, which complicate the identification of the sulforaphane adduct sites on Keap1. In this study, we characterized the stability of sulforaphane thionoacyl adducts and developed a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method to map labile sulforaphane adduct sites formed on Keap1 in vitro. Sulforaphane displays a distinctly different pattern of Keap1 modification than previously studied ARE inducers that modify Keap1 by alkylation. Sulforaphane modified Keap1 most readily in the Kelch domain, rather than in the central linker domain, which is targeted by previously characterized ARE inducers. Also, in contrast to previously studied ARE inducers and as reported recently [Zhang, et al. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 30091-30099], sulforaphane treatment in vivo does not lead to the accumulation of ubiquitinated Keap1. Our observations suggest a novel mechanism for Nrf2 stabilization by sulforaphane-Keap1 thionoacyl adduct formation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zhang, D. D., & Hannink, M. (2003) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.23.22.8137-8151.2003 · Cited by 1,480
McMahon, M., Itoh, K., Yamamoto, M., & Hayes, J. D. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m300931200 · Cited by 1,141
The Keap1 BTB/POZ dimerization function is required to sequester Nrf2 in cytoplasm
Zipper, L. M., & Mulcahy, R. T. (2002) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m206530200 · Cited by 366
Cited by
Cell Survival Responses to Environmental Stresses Via the Keap1-Nrf2-ARE Pathway
Kensler, T. W., Wakabayashi, N., & Biswal, S. (2007) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.46.120604.141046 · Cited by 3,630
The KEAP1-NRF2 system: a thiol-based sensor-effector apparatus for maintaining redox homeostasis
Yamamoto, M., Kensler, T. W., & Motohashi, H. (2018) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00023.2017 · Cited by 1,968
The Molecular Mechanisms Regulating the KEAP1-NRF2 Pathway
Baird, L., & Yamamoto, M. (2020) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00099-20 · Cited by 1,542
Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway in stress response and cancer evolution
Taguchi, K., Motohashi, H., & Yamamoto, M. (2011) · Genes to Cells · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2443.2010.01473.x · Cited by 1,478
Glutathione Homeostasis and Functions: Potential Targets for Medical Interventions
Lushchak, V. I. (2012) · Journal of Amino Acids · doi:10.1155/2012/736837 · Cited by 1,266
Metadata
- Authors
- Hong, F., Freeman, M. L., & Liebler, D. C.
- Venue
- Chemical Research in Toxicology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-11-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1917-1926
- ISSN
- 0893-228X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5010
- OpenAlex
- W2021270662
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.