Cited by 133Carcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Identification of an Acetaldehyde Adduct in Human Liver DNA and Quantitation as N2-Ethyldeoxyguanosine

Open access
Wang, Mingyao, Yu, Nanxiong, Chen, Li, Villalta, Peter W., Hochalter, J. Bradley, Hecht, Stephen S.·2006·Chemical Research in Toxicology

Abstract

Acetaldehyde, an ubiquitous mutagen and carcinogen, could be involved in human cancer etiology. Because DNA adducts are important in carcinogenesis, we have used liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) to explore the presence in human liver DNA of the major acetaldehyde DNA adduct, N2-ethylidenedeoxyguanosine (1). DNA was isolated and enzymatically hydrolyzed in the presence of NaBH3CN, which quantitatively converts adduct 1 to N2-ethyldeoxyguanosine (N2-ethyl-dGuo, 2). [15N5]N2-Ethyl-dGuo was synthesized and used as an internal standard. Adduct 2 was enriched from the hydrolysate by solid phase extraction and analyzed by LC-ESI-MS/MS. Clear peaks were observed for adduct 2 in analyses of human liver DNA, calf thymus DNA, and rat liver DNA. These peaks were not observed, or were much smaller, when the NaBH3CN step was omitted. When the DNA was subjected to neutral thermal hydrolysis prior to NaBH3CN treatment, adduct 2 was not observed. Control experiments using [13C2]acetaldehyde demonstrated that adducts 1 and 2 were not formed as artifacts during DNA isolation and analysis. These results strongly indicate that adduct 1 is present in human liver DNA and demonstrate that it can be quantified as adduct 2. Levels of adduct 2 measured in 12 human liver samples were 534 +/- 245 fmol/micromol dGuo (mean +/- SD). The results of this study establish the presence of an acetaldehyde adduct in human liver DNA and suggest that it is a commonly occurring endogenous DNA adduct.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/tx0502948

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Free amino acid residues of proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, and nucleophilic molecules are major targets of adduct formation or covalent binding with reactive molecules such as acetaldehyde, acrolein, crotonaldehyde, formaldehyde, malondialdehyde, 4-hydroxynonenal, 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine, N2-((furan-2-yl)methyl)-2′-deoxyguanosine, and N2-ethyl-2′-deoxyguanosine.

    “Free amino acid residues of proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, and nucleophilic molecules are major targets of adduct formation or covalent binding with reactive molecules such as acetaldehyde, acrolein, crotonaldehyde, formaldehyde, malondialdehyde, 4-hydroxynonenal, 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine, N2-((furan-2-yl)methyl)-2′-deoxyguanosine, and N2-ethyl-2′-deoxyguanosine164–166.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Report on Carcinogens. 11th Edition. Research Triangle Park, N.C.; 2004. pp. III-1–III-3. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, M., Yu, N., Chen, L., Villalta, P. W., Hochalter, J. B., & Hecht, S. S.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Hecht, Stephen S.
Venue
Chemical Research in Toxicology
Published
2006-01-12
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
319-324
ISSN
  • 0893-228X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5010
OpenAlex
W2164985539
Cited by
133
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 17
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemical Research in Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA077598, CA-77598)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES-11297, R01ES011297)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
acetaldehyde, DNA adducts, adduct quantitation, carcinogenesis, mutagenicity
MeSH terms
Acetaldehyde, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Deoxyguanosine, DNA, Humans, Liver, Time Factors, Molecular Structure, DNA Adducts, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review