The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distinctive Toxicity of TiO2 Rutile/Anatase Mixed Phase Nanoparticles on Caco-2 Cells
Abstract
Titanium dioxide has a long-standing use as a food additive. Micrometric powders are, e.g., applied as whiteners in confectionary or dairy products. Possible hazards of ingested nanometric TiO(2) particles for humans and the potential influence of varying specific surface area (SSA) are currently under discussion. Five TiO(2)-samples were analyzed for purity, crystallinity, primary particle size, SSA, ζ potential, and aggregation/agglomeration. Their potential to induce cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, and DNA damage was evaluated in human intestinal Caco-2 cells. Only anatase-rutile containing samples, in contrast to the pure anatase samples, induced significant LDH leakage or mild DNA damage (Fpg-comet assay). Evaluation of the metabolic competence of the cells (WST-1 assay) revealed a highly significant correlation between the SSA of the anatase samples and cytotoxicity. The anatase/rutile samples showed higher toxicity per unit surface area than the pure anatase powders. However, none of the samples affected cellular markers of oxidative stress. Our findings suggest that both SSA and crystallinity are critical determinants of TiO(2)-toxicity toward intestinal cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ultrafine particulate pollutants induce oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage
Li, N., Sioutas, C., Cho, A., Schmitz, D., Misra, C., Sempf, J., Wang, M., Oberley, T., Froines, J., & Nel, A. (2003) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.6000 · Cited by 2,097
Physico-chemical features of engineered nanoparticles relevant to their toxicity
Fubini, B., Ghiazza, M., & Fenoglio, I. (2010) · Nanotoxicology · doi:10.3109/17435390.2010.509519 · Cited by 297
Self-citationMultiple aspects of the interaction of biomacromolecules with inorganic surfaces
Fenoglio, I., Fubini, B., Ghibaudi, E. M., & Turci, F. (2011) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2011.08.001 · Cited by 176
Self-citationNano-TiO2– feasibility and challenges for human health risk assessment based on open literature
Christensen, F. M., Johnston, H. J., Stone, V., Aitken, R. J., Hankin, S., Peters, S., & Aschberger, K. (2011) · Nanotoxicology · doi:10.3109/17435390.2010.504899 · Cited by 141
Cited by
Brun, E., Barreau, F., Veronesi, G., Fayard, B., Sorieul, S., Chanéac, C., Carapito, C., Rabilloud, T., Mabondzo, A., Herlin-Boime, N., et al. (2014) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/1743-8977-11-13 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Gerloff, K., Fenoglio, I., Carella, E., Kolling, J., Albrecht, C., Boots, A. W., Förster, I., & Schins, R. P. F.
- Venue
- Chemical Research in Toxicology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-02-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 646-655
- ISSN
- 0893-228X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5010
- OpenAlex
- W2046940432
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.