The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cytotoxicity of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles in Mouse Fibroblast Cells
Abstract
Nanotitanium dioxide (TiO2) is an important industrial material that is widely used as an additive in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and food colorants. Although the small size of the TiO2 nanoparticle is useful in various applications, the biosafety of this material needs to be evaluated. In this study, mouse fibroblast (L929) cells were used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of different concentrations (3-600 microg/mL) of homogeneous and weakly aggregated TiO2 nanoparticles in aqueous solution. The L929 cells became round and even shrank as the concentration of TiO2 nanoparticles increased. Moreover, TiO2 nanoparticle-treated cells had condensed fragmented chromatin or were directly necrosed, as observed by acridine orange (AO) staining. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis showed that in cells cultured in a medium containing 300 microg/mL TiO2, the number of lysosomes increased, and some cytoplasmic organelles were damaged. In addition, there was a significant increase in oxidative stress at higher TiO2 nanoparticle concentrations (>60 microg/mL). As the concentration of TiO2 nanoparticles increased in the culture medium, the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increased, while those of methyl tetrazolium cytotoxicity (MTT), glutathione (GSH), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) decreased. A possible mechanism for the cytotoxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles is also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Limbach, L. K., Li, Y., Grass, R. N., Brunner, T. J., Hintermann, M. A., Muller, M., Gunther, D., & Stark, W. J. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es051043o · Cited by 779
Cited by
Toxicity and Environmental Risks of Nanomaterials: Challenges and Future Needs
RAY, P. C., YU, H., & FU, P. P. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C · doi:10.1080/10590500802708267 · Cited by 936
Autophagy and lysosomal dysfunction as emerging mechanisms of nanomaterial toxicity
Stern, S. T., Adiseshaiah, P. P., & Crist, R. M. (2012) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/1743-8977-9-20 · Cited by 836
Titanium dioxide in our everyday life; is it safe?
Skocaj, M., Filipic, M., Petkovic, J., & Novak, S. (2011) · Radiology and Oncology · doi:10.2478/v10019-011-0037-0 · Cited by 549
Zhang, X., Meng, L., Lu, Q., Fei, Z., & Dyson, P. J. (2009) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.025 · Cited by 536
Self-citationStudy of the in vitro cytotoxicity testing of medical devices
LI, W., ZHOU, J., & XU, Y. (2015) · Biomedical Reports · doi:10.3892/br.2015.481 · Cited by 461
Metadata
- Authors
- Jin, C.-Y., Zhu, B.-S., Wang, X.-F., & Lu, Q.-H.
- Venue
- Chemical Research in Toxicology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-08-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1871-1877
- ISSN
- 0893-228X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5010
- OpenAlex
- W2012319331
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.