Cited by 121Nitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsRedox biology and oxidative stressFree Radicals and Antioxidants

Kinetics of S-nitrosation of thiols in nitric oxide solutions

Keshive, Manish, Singh, Sukhjeet, Wishnok, John S., Tannenbaum, Steven R., Deen, William M.·1996·Chemical Research in Toxicology

Abstract

The S-nitroso adducts of nitric oxide (NO) may serve as carriers of NO and play a role in cell signaling and/or cytotoxicity. A quantitative understanding of the kinetics of S-nitrosothiol formation in solutions containing NO and O2 is important for understanding these roles of S-nitroso compounds in vivo. Rates of S-nitrosation in aqueous solutions were investigated for three thiols: glutathione, N-acetylcysteine, and N-acetylpenicillamine. Nitrous anhydride (N2O3), an intermediate in the formation of nitrite from NO and O2, is the most likely NO donor for N-nitrosation of amines as well as for S-nitrosation of thiols, at physiological pH. This motivated the use of a competitive kinetics approach, in which the rates of thiol nitrosation were compared with that of a secondary amine, morpholine. The kinetic studies were carried out with known amounts of NO and O2 in solutions containing one thiol (400 microM) and morpholine (200-5700 microM) in 0.01 M phosphate buffer at pH 7.4 and 23 degrees C. It was found that disulfide formation, transnitrosation reactions, and decomposition of the S-nitrosothiols was expressed as k7[N2O3][RSH], where RSH represents the thiol. The rate constant for S-nitrosation relative to that for N2O3 hydrolysis (k4) was found to be k7/k4 = (4.15 +/- 0.28) x 10(4), (2.11 +/- 0.11) x 10(4), and (0.48 +/- 0.04) x 10(4) M-1 for glutathione, N-acetylcysteine, and N-acetylpenicillamine, respectively. The overall (observed) rates of nitrosothiol formation reflect the fact that [N2O3] varies [NO]2[O2] and that [N2O3] also depends on [RSH] and the concentration of phosphate. Using a detailed kinetic model to account for these effects, the present results could be reconciled with apparently dissimilar findings reported previously by others.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/tx960036y

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keshive, M., Singh, S., Wishnok, J. S., Tannenbaum, S. R., & Deen, W. M.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Deen, William M.
Venue
Chemical Research in Toxicology
Published
1996-01-01
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
988-993
ISSN
  • 0893-228X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5010
OpenAlex
W2027641362
Cited by
121
References
7
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemical Research in Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P01-CA 26731, P01CA026731)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Free Radicals and Antioxidants
Keywords
S-nitrosylation, S-nitrosothiols, nitric oxide, glutathione, N-acetylcysteine, morpholine, transnitrosation, disulfide bond formation, nitrite production, competition kinetics, reaction kinetics, signal transduction, cytotoxicity
MeSH terms
Acetylcysteine, Glutathione, Kinetics, Morpholines, Nitric Oxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Solutions, Sulfhydryl Compounds, Nitrosation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review