CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 67Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyBipolar Disorder and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stability and Course of Personality Disorders: The Need to Consider Comorbidities and Continuities Between Axis I Psychiatric Disorders and Axis II Personality Disorders

Grilo, Carlos M., McGlashan, Thomas H., Skodol, Andrew E.·2000·Psychiatric Quarterly
DOI 10.1023/a:1004680122613
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The literature pertaining to the stability and course of personality disorders is briefly reviewed. Available data suggest that PD diagnoses demonstrate only moderate stability and that--although generally associated with a plethora of negative outcomes--they can show improvement over time. This paper highlights the pervasiveness of diagnostic co-occurrence and its implications for continued investigation of the question of PD stability. In addition to examining the stability (and outcome) of PDs, longitudinal studies need to consider continuities between diagnoses. The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorder Study (CLPS) is described briefly vis-a-vis some of these major issues.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1004680122613

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd Edition (DSM-III). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1980.
  2. Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd Edition-Revised (DSM-III-R). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1987.
  3. First MB, Gibbon M, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders-patient version (SCID-I/P) 1996. New York, NY: Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute. 1996.
  4. Zanarini MC, Frankenburg FR, Sickel AE, Yong L. The Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (DIPD-IV). Belmont MA: McLean Hospital, Laboratory for the Study of Adult Development. 1996.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Grilo, C. M., McGlashan, T. H., & Skodol, A. E.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Grilo, Carlos M.
ORCID
Venue
Psychiatric Quarterly
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2000-12
Volume
71
Issue
4
Pages
291-307
ISSN
  • 0033-2720 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6709
DOI
10.1023/a:1004680122613
OpenAlex
W1585269654
Cited by
67
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Psychiatric Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH50850, MH 50839)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
personality disorders, diagnostic stability, comorbidities, longitudinal outcomes
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Personality Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review