Cited by 514Face recognition and analysisFace and Expression RecognitionVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recognizing Facial Expressions in Image Sequences Using Local Parameterized Models of Image Motion

Black, Michael J., Yacoob, Yaser·1997·International Journal of Computer Vision

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1007977618277

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The importance of facial dynamics in FER has been established in many vision experiments.

    “The importance of facial dynamics in FER has been established in many vision experiments [16,19].”

    From Multimodal learning for facial expression recognition (2015) · cites this paper as [19]

  • In Black and Yacoob's approach, the initial regions for the head and the facial features were selected by hand and thereafter automatically tracked.

    “In the approach proposed by Black and Yacoob, the initial regions for the head and the facial features were selected by hand and thereafter automatically tracked.”
  • Lip biting is sometimes mistakenly identified as a smile by the Black and Yacoob method.

    “ªLip bitingº is sometimes mistakenly identified as a smile [2].”
  • The Black and Yacoob method does not deal with blends of emotional expressions; for example, a blend of the angry and scared expressions is recognized as disgust.

    “Also, the method does not deal with blends of emotional expressions.For example, a blend of the angry and scared expressions is recognized as disgust.”
  • Only three of the surveyed systems deal to some extent with rigid head motions.

    “Only three of the surveyed systems deal to some extent with rigid head motions ([2], [18], [30]).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Waxman, A. M., Kamgar-Parsi, B., and Subbarao, M. 1987. Close-form solutions to image flow equations. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, ICCV-87, London, England, pp. 12-24.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Black, M. J., & Yacoob, Y.
Affiliations
  • Palo Alto Research Center (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
  • Black, Michael J.
  • Yacoob, Yaser
Venue
International Journal of Computer Vision
Published
1997-10
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
23-48
ISSN
  • 0920-5691 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1405
OpenAlex
W1509031088
Cited by
514
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 12
FWCI
13.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Computer Vision (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Keywords
facial expression recognition, facial motion, affine motion model, non-rigid motion, articulated motion, head movement, motion tracking, image sequences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review