Cited by 11Gastrointestinal motility and disordersCoffee research and impactsGastroesophageal reflux and treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Coffee on Motor and Sensory Function of Proximal Stomach

Boekema, Paul J., Samsom, Melvin, Roelofs, Jan M.M., Smout, André J.P.M.·2001·Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Abstract

Some people attribute dyspeptic symptoms to drinking coffee, suggesting that coffee affects one or more functions of the proximal gastrointestinal tract. In a randomized controlled, cross-over, single-blinded study, the effects of coffee on gastric relaxation, gastric wall compliance and sensations, elicited by distension, were investigated in 10 healthy volunteers. Using the barostat technique, volume changes of an intragastric bag were recorded for 20 min after intragastric administration of 280 ml of coffee or water. Then, after deflation, the volume of the bag was increased stepwise every 3 min to assess gastric wall compliance and wall tension. At the end of every volume step, sensations (nausea, pain, and bloating) were scored. During the first 20 min after coffee administration, the volume change of the intragastric bag was larger than after water (P < 0.05). There were no differences in gastric wall compliance, wall tension, or symptom scores. In conclusions, coffee, in comparison with water, enhances the adaptive relaxation of the proximal stomach, but has no effect on its wall compliance, wall tension, or sensory function.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1010733222245

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Berkowitz JM, Shields JE, Andersen IH, Praissman M: Plasma gastrin response to coffee, Sanka, caffeine and water. Gastroenterology 66:666, 1974
  2. Borger HW, Schafmayer A, Arnold R, Becker HD, Creutzfeldt W: Der Einfluss van Kaffee und Coffein auf den Serumgastrinspiegel und die Sauresekretion beim Menschen. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 101:455–457, 1976
  3. Westermann H, Muller-Wieland K, Spielman M: Osophagusdruck und Serumgastrin nach Kaffeegenuss. Med Klin 72:2201–2203, 1977
  4. Hasler WL: The physiology of gastric motility and gastric emptying. In Textbook of Gastroenterology. T Yamada (ed). Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven, 1995, pp 181–206

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Boekema, P. J., Samsom, M., Roelofs, J. M. M., & Smout, A. J. P. M.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Venue
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Published
2001-05
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
945-951
ISSN
  • 0163-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2568
OpenAlex
W11283219
Cited by
11
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Digestive Diseases and Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Keywords
coffee, proximal stomach, gastric relaxation, gastric distension, dyspepsia, nausea, bloating
MeSH terms
Adult, Coffee, Compliance, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sensation, Stomach, Water, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review