CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 94Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differences in sexual risk behaviors between college students with same-sex and opposite-sex experience: results from a national survey.

Eisenberg, Marla·2001·Archives of Sexual Behavior
DOI 10.1023/a:1011958816438
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The goal of this study was to identify differences in the sexual health behaviors (condom use and number of sexual partners) between college students with same-sex sexual experiences and those with only opposite-sex partners. Data from a random sample of American university students were gathered as part of the 1997 College Alcohol Study. Odds ratios were estimated for consistent condom use and multiple sex partners for students with same-sex or both-sex sexual partners compared to those with exclusively heterosexual contacts. Five percent of respondents reported ever having a same-sex partner. Significant differences in safer-sex practices were found between groups. Females with both-sex experience and males with both-sex or only same-sex experiences were more likely to report multiple recent sexual partners than their peers with only opposite-sex partners. Odds ratios of consistent condom use were lower for men with only same-sex experience than among those with only opposite-sex partners. Findings have implications for sexual health education on the college campus. Consistent condom use remains low among college students. Education programs should emphasize the importance of limiting the number of lifetime sex partners, especially among students with same-sex experiences.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1011958816438

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Past research found that women students who partnered with both genders reported more sexual partners than those with only same-sex or opposite-sex encounters, and men students who partnered with both genders had more partners than those with only opposite-sex sexual partners.

    “Past research found that women students who partnered with both genders reported more sexual partners than those with only same-sex or opposite-sex encounters, and men students who partnered with both genders had more partners than those with only opposite-sex sexual partners (Eisenberg, 2001).”

    From The role of culture in explaining college students’ selection into hookups, dates, and long-term romantic relationships (2016) · cites this paper as Eisenberg, 2001

  • Hookup rates in our sample were somewhat lower than the 70-75% rate found in prior research.

    “Hookup rates were somewhat lower than the 70-75% rate found in prior research”

    From The role of culture in explaining college students’ selection into hookups, dates, and long-term romantic relationships (2016) · cites this paper as Eisenberg, 2001

  • Studies indicate that certain WSW, particularly adolescents, young women, and WSWM, might be at increased risk for STIs and HIV on the basis of reported risk behaviors.

    “Studies indicate that certain WSW, particularly adolescents, young women, and WSWM, might be at increased risk for STIs and HIV on the basis of reported risk behaviors (275–280).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [276]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1998b). HIV/AIDS Surveill. Rep. 10(1): 14–15.
  2. Leik, M., Malow, R. M., Ireland, S. J., Porter, L., and Lewis, J. E. (1995). HIV risk and drug use among college women. NIDA Res. Monogr. 151: 54.
  3. Lewis, J. E. (1995). Psychosocial Correlates of HIV Risk Behavior Among College Students: A Test of the AIDS Risk Reduction Model, Dissertation, University of Miami.
  4. SAS Institute. (1990). SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, 4th edn. Vol. 1, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Eisenberg, M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Eisenberg, Marla
ORCID
Eisenberg, Marla
Venue
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2001-12
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
575-589
ISSN
  • 0004-0002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2800
DOI
10.1023/a:1011958816438
OpenAlex
W1526183406
Cited by
94
References
24
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
sexual risk behavior, university students, condom use, multiple sexual partners, sex education, gender differences, sexual health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Ethnicity, Female, Gender Identity, Homosexuality, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk-Taking, Sex Factors, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review