CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 71Gender Studies in LanguageGender and Feminist StudiesSports, Gender, and Society

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Contemporary Arguments Against Nonsexist Language: Blaubergs (1980) Revisited

Parks, Janet B., Roberton, Mary Ann·1998·Sex Roles
DOI 10.1023/a:1018827227128
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1018827227128

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Blaubergs, M. (1980). An analysis of classic arguments against changing sexist language. Women's Studies International Quarterly, 3, 135–147. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bodine, A. (1975). Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: Singular “they,” sex-indefinite “he,” and “he or she.” Language in Society, 4, 129–146. · DOI
  3. Cameron, D. (1985). Feminism and linguistic theory. New York: St. Martin's Press. · DOI
  4. Carroll, J. B. (Ed.). (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  5. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cronin, C., & Jreisat, S. (1995). Effects of modeling on the use of nonsexist language among high school freshpersons and seniors. Sex Roles, 33, 819–830. · DOI
  7. Eitzen, D. S., & Zinn, M. B. (1989). The de-athleticization of women: The naming and gender marking of collegiate sports teams. Sociology of Sport Journal, 6, 362–370. · DOI
  8. Eitzen, D. S., & Zinn, M. B. (1993). The sexist naming of collegiate athletic teams and resistance to change. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 17, 34–41. · DOI
  9. Etaugh, C., & Spandikow, D. B. (1981). Changing attitudes toward women: A longitudinal study of college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 591–594. · DOI
  10. Gastil, J. (1990). Generic pronouns and sexist language: The oxymoronic character of masculine generics. Sex Roles, 23, 629–643. · DOI
  11. Hamilton, M. C. (1988). Using masculine generics: Does generic he increase male bias in the user's imagery? Sex Roles, 19, 785–798. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Harrigan, J. A., & Lucic, K. S. (1988). Attitudes about gender bias in language: A reevaluation. Sex Roles, 19, 129–140. · DOI
  13. Henley, N. M. (1989). Molehill or mountain? What we know and don't know about sex bias in language. In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (Eds.), Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  14. Hyde, J. S. (1984). Children's understanding of sexist language. Developmental Psychology, 20, 697–706. · DOI
  15. Jacobson, M. B., & Insko, W. R., Jr. (1985). Use of nonsexist pronouns as a function of one's feminist orientation. Sex Roles, 13, 1–7. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Jaggar, A. (1983). Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.
  17. Kidd, V. (1971). A study of the images produced through the use of the male pronoun as the generic. Moments in Contemporary Rhetoric and Communication, 1, 25–30.
  18. Kingston, A. J., & Lovelace, T. L. (1977). Guidelines for authors: A new form of censorship? Journal of Reading Behavior, 9, 89–93. · DOI
  19. Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in Society, 2, 45–80. · DOI · Paper page
  20. MacKay, D. G. (1980). Psychology, prescriptive grammar, and the pronoun problem. American Psychologist, 35, 444–449. · DOI
  21. Martyna, W. (1978). What does “he” mean? Use of the generic masculine. Journal of Communication, 28, 131–138. · DOI
  22. McMinn, M. R., Lindsay, S. F., Hannum, L. E., & Troyer, P. K. (1990). Does sexist language reflect personal characteristics? Sex Roles, 23, 389–396. · DOI
  23. Merritt, R. D., & Kok, C. J. (1995). Attribution of gender to a gender-unspecified individual: An evaluation of the people = male hypothesis. Sex Roles, 33, 145–157. · DOI
  24. Messner, M. A., Duncan, M. C., & Jensen, K. (1993). Separating the men from the girls: The gendered language of televised sports. Gender & Society, 7, 121–137. · DOI
  25. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  26. Miller, C., & Swift, K. (1988). The handbook of nonsexist writing (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
  27. Moulton, J., Robinson, G. M., & Elias, C. (1978). Sex bias in language use: “Neutral” pronouns that aren't. American Psychologist, 33, 1032–1036. · DOI
  28. Ng, S. H. (1990). Androcentric coding of man and his in memory by language users. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 455–464. · DOI
  29. Nilsen, A. P. (1977). Sexism in children's books and elementary teaching materials. In A. P. Nilsen, H. A. Bosmajian, H. L. Gershuny, & J. P. Stanley (Eds.), Sexism and language, Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
  30. Parks, J. B. (Executive Producer), Harper, M. C. (Script Writer), & Lopez, P. G. (Director). (1994). One person's struggle with gender-biased language [Videotape]. Bowling Green, OH: WBGU-TV.
  31. Parks, J. B., & Roberton, M. A. (1996). Attitudes toward sexist language in sport: Validation of an instrument. Future Focus: Ohio Journal of Health, Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 17(2), 33–34.
  32. Parks, J. B., & Roberton, M. A. (1998). Influence of age, gender, and context on attitudes toward sexist/nonsexist language: Is sport a special case? Sex Roles, 38, 477–494. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Rubin, D. L., & Greene, K. L. (1991). Effects of biological and psychological gender, age cohort, and interviewer gender on attitudes toward gender-inclusive/exclusive language. Sex Roles, 24, 391–412. · DOI · Paper page
  34. Rubin, D. L., Greene, K., & Schneider, D. (1994). Adopting gender-inclusive language reforms: Diachronic and synchronic variation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 91–114. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Schneider, J. W., & Hacker, S. L. (1973). Sex role imagery and use of the generic “man” in introductory texts: A case in the sociology of sociology. American Sociologist, 8, 12–18.
  36. Shimanoff, S. B. (1977). Man = human: Empirical support for the Whorfian hypothesis. Bulletin: Women's Studies in Communication, 1(2), 21–27.
  37. Simpson, P. (1993). Language, ideology, and point of view. New York: Routledge. · DOI
  38. Thorne, B., Kramarae, C., & Henley, N. (1983). Language, gender, and society: Opening a second decade of research. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender and society. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Parks, J. B., & Roberton, M. A.
Venue
Sex Roles
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1998-09
Volume
39
Issue
5-6
Pages
445-461
ISSN
  • 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2762
DOI
10.1023/a:1018827227128
OpenAlex
W1629136
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
Keywords
sexism, sport management students, gender equality attitudes, lack of understanding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review