The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development and Control of a ‘Soft-Actuated’ Exoskeleton for Use in Physiotherapy and Training
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ultrasonic motors have poor response at low speed, leading to problems tracking the user's slow voluntary motion.
“The main problem with the ultrasonic motors was their poor response at low speed, therefore, leading to problems to track user's slow voluntary motion [15].”
From Design and Validation of a Rehabilitation Robotic Exoskeleton for Tremor Assessment and Suppression (2007) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Alexander, M.A., Nelson, M.R., and Shah, A. 1992. Orthotics, adapted seating and assistive devices. In Pediatric Rehabilitation, 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, pp. 186–187.
- An, K.N., Askew, L.J., and Chao, E.Y. 1986. Biomechanics and functional assessment of upper extremities. Trends in Ergonomics/ Human Factors III, Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V., North-Holland.
- Benjuya, N. and Kenney, S.B. 1990. Hybrid arm orthosis. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, 2(2):155–163.
- Burgar, C.G., Lum, P.S., Shor, P.C., and Machiel Van der Loos, H.F. 2000. Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: The Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37(6).
- Chou, C.P. and Hannaford, B. 1996. Measurement and modeling of McKibben pneumatic artificial muscles. IEEE Transactions On Robotics and Automation, 12(1). · DOI · Paper page
- Caldwell, D.G., Medrano-Cerda, G.A., and Goodwin, M.J. 1995. Control of pneumatic muscle actuators. IEEE Control Systems Journal, 15(1):40–48. · DOI
- Caldwell, D.G., Medrano-Cerda, G.A., and Goodwin, M. 1994. Characteristics and adaptive control of pneumatic muscle actuators for a robotic elbow. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Diego, California, pp. 3558–3563. · DOI
- Harold, P., Van Cotte., and Kinkade, R.G. 1972. Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design, McGraw Hill.
- Harwin, W.S., Rahman, T., and Foulds, R.A. 1995. Review of design issues in rehabilitation robotics with reference to North American research. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 1:3–13. · DOI
- Hogan, N., Krebs, H.I., Charnnarong, J., Srikrishna, P., and Sharon, A. 1992. MIT-MANUS: A workstation for manual therapy and training. In Proc. IEEE Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 161–165.
- Homma, K. and Arai, T. 1995. Design of an upper limb assist system with parallel mechanism. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1302–1307. · DOI
- Johnson, G.R. and Buckley, M.A. 1997. Development of a new Motorised Upper Limp Orthotic System (MULOS). In Proceedings of the Rehabilitation Engineering Society of North America. Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 399–401.
- Kalawsky, R. 1993. The Science of Virtual Reality and Virtual Environments. Addison-Wesley Ltd., UK.
- Krebs, H.I., Hogan, N., Aisen, M.L., and Volpe, B.T. 1998. Robotaided neuro-rehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Eng., pp. 75–87. · DOI
- Krebs, H.I., Volpe, B.T., Aisen, M.L., and Hogan, N. 2000. Increasing productivity and quality of care: Robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37(6).
- Marchese, S.S., Buckley, M.A., Valleggi, R., and Johnson, G.R. 1997. An optimised design of an active orthosis for the shouder—an iterative approach. International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Stanford, CA.
- Mark, P., Gomes, G.T., and Johnson, G.R. 2002. A robotic approach to neuro-rehabilitation—interpretation of biomechanical data, 7th International Symposium on the 3D Analysis of HumanMovement, Centre for Life, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
- Reinkensmeyer, D.J., Dewald, J.P.A., and Rymer, W.Z. 1999. Guidance-based quadification of arm impairment following brain injury. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Eng., 7(1). · DOI
- Reinkensmeyer, D.J., Kahn, L.E., Averbuch, M., McKenna-Cole, A., Schmit, B.D., and Rymer, W.Z. 2000. Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: Progress with Arm Guide. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37(6). · DOI
- Stern, P.H. and Lauko, T. 1975. Modular designed wheelchair based orthotic system for upper extremeties. Paraplegia, 12:299–304.
- Song, P., Kumar, V., and Bajcsy, R. 1999. Design of human-worn assistive devices for people with disabilities. International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Stanford, CA.
- Tan, H.Z., Srinivasan, M.A., Eberman, B., and Cheng, B. 1994. Human factors for the design of force-reflecting haptic interfaces. Dynamic Systems and Control, DSC, 55(1):353–359, ASME.
- Tsagarakis, N. and Caldwell, D.G. 2000. Improved modelling and assessment of pneumatic muscle actuators. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, USA.
- Yardley, A., Parrini, G., Carus, D., and Thorpe, J. 1997. Development of an upper limb orthotic exercise system. In International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Stanford, CA.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biomedical applications of soft robotics
Cianchetti, M., Laschi, C., Menciassi, A., & Dario, P. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0022-y · Cited by 1,435
Veneman, J. F., Ekkelenkamp, R., Kruidhof, R., van der Helm, F. C. T., & van der Kooij, H. (2006) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364906063829 · Cited by 428
Design and Validation of a Rehabilitation Robotic Exoskeleton for Tremor Assessment and Suppression
Rocon, E., Belda-Lois, J. M., Ruiz, A. F., Manto, M., Moreno, J. C., & Pons, J. L. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2007.903917 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsagarakis, N. G., & Caldwell, D. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Salford (GB)
- Venue
- Autonomous Robots
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-33
- ISSN
- 0929-5593 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7527
- OpenAlex
- W1513008436
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- usir.salford.ac.uk
- Licence
- Locations
- Autonomous Robots (publishedVersion)
- University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Keywords
- pneumatic muscle actuators, upper limb rehabilitation, upper limb training, orthosis, compliance control, power assist, assistive devices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
