Cited by 68Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderVisual perception and processing mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Abnormal Saccadic Eye Movements in Autistic Children

Kemner, C., Verbaten, M. N., Cuperus, J. M., Camfferman, G., van Engeland, H.·1998·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

The saccadic eye movements, generated during a visual oddball task, of autistic children, normal children, children with attention deficit disorder and hyperactivity (ADDH), and dyslexic children were examined to determine whether autistic children differed from these other groups in saccadic frequency. Autistic children made more saccades during the presentation of frequent stimuli (than normals and ADDH children), and between stimulus presentations. Also, unlike the normal and dyslexic groups, their saccadic frequency did not depend on stimulus type. This abnormal pattern of saccades may negatively influence the ability to attend to stimuli, and thereby learning processes. Suggestions are made with respect to possible abnormalities in subcortical mechanisms involved in saccade generation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1026015120128

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Older individuals with ASD do not show variability in fixation duration contingent on familiarity and task demands.

    “Thus, there is evidence that older individuals with ASD do not show variability in fixation duration contingent on familiarity and task demands.”
  • Fixation durations were assessed based on eye-tracker data, rather than on hand coding of fixation durations or EOG.

    “A final limitation of the present findings is that fixation durations were assessed based on eye-tracker data, rather than on hand coding of fixation durations (cf refs. 38, 39) or EOG21.”
  • Kemner and colleagues found that 8-12-year-old children with ASD made more saccades, reflecting shorter fixation durations, than children with typical development or ADHD when viewing static geometric shapes.

    “For example, Kemner and colleagues21 found that 8-12-year-old children with ASD made more saccades (reflecting shorter fixation durations) than children with typical development or ADHD when viewing static geometric shapes (see also Refs. 22, 23 - although findings on fixation durations in adults with ASD are not consistent24).”
  • Typically developing children made more saccades, suggesting shorter fixation durations, when viewing familiar compared to unfamiliar objects, whereas children with ASD did not.

    “They also found that whilst typically developing children made more saccades (suggesting shorter fixation durations) when viewing familiar compared to unfamiliar objects, children with ASD did not21.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Finn, J. D. (1978). Multivariance, user's guide. Version VI, release 2. Chicago: National Education Resources.
  2. Fisher, B., & Boch, R. (1991). Cerebral Cortex. In R. H. S. Carpenter (Ed.), Eye movements (pp. 277–296). Cambridge, UK: MacMillan.
  3. Mason, C., & Kandel, E. R. (1991). Central visual pathways. In E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, & T. M. Jessell (Eds.), Principles of neuroscience (pp. 420–439). New York: Elsevier.
  4. Roelofs, J. W. (1987). Verweking van visuele informatie bij autistische kinderen [Processing of visual information in autistic children]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
  5. Schiller, P. H. (1985). A model for the generation of visually guided saccadic eye movements. In D. Rose & V. G. Dobson (Eds.), Models of the visual cortex (pp. 62–70). London: Wiley.
  6. Wing, L. (1980). Schedule of handicaps, behavior and skills. London: Social Psychiatry Unit.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kemner, C., Verbaten, M. N., Cuperus, J. M., Camfferman, G., & van Engeland, H.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
1998-02
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
61-67
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W1546548154
Cited by
68
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
saccades, autism spectrum disorder, visual oddball task, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, dyslexia, stimulation frequency, subcortical mechanisms, visual attention, children
MeSH terms
Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Autistic Disorder, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Dyslexia, Female, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reference Values, Saccades, Ocular Motility Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review