Cited by 29Climate change impacts on agricultureClimate variability and modelsClimate Change Policy and Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial Scale Effects of Climate Scenarios on Simulated Cotton Production in the Southeastern U.S.A.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1026030400826

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Albers, D. W., Mobley, J., and Tracy, P. W.: 1992, 'Evaluation of GOSSYM-COMAX in Missouri 1987-1991', in Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf. National Cotton Council, Memphis, Tennessee, U.S.A., pp. 1350–1351.
  2. Baker, D. N. and Landivar, J. A.: 1991, 'The Simulation of Plant Development in GOSSYM', in Hodges, T. (ed.), Predicting Crop Phenology, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 153–170.
  3. Dudek, D. J.: 1989, 'Climate Change Impacts upon Agriculture and Resources: A Case Study of California', in Smith, J. and Tirpak, D. (eds.), The Potential Effects of Global Climate Change on the United States, Appendix C: Agriculture, Vol. 1, EPA-230-05-89-053.
  4. Hodges, H. F., Whisler, F. D., Bridges, S. M., Reddy, K. R., and McKinion, J. M.: 1998, 'Simulation in Crop Management: GOSSYM/COMAX', in Peart R. M. and Curry, A. B. (eds.), Agricultural Systems Modeling and Simulation, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, U.S.A., pp. 235–281.
  5. Reilly, J. M. and U.S. National Assessment Agriculture Sector Team: 2001, Agriculture: The Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change for the United States, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 136 pp.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Doherty, R. M., Mearns, L. O., Reddy, K. R., Downton, M. W., & McDaniel, L.
Affiliations
  • NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
  • Mississippi State University (US)
Corresponding author
Doherty, Ruth M.
Venue
Climatic Change
Published
2003-09
Volume
60
Issue
1-2
Pages
99-129
ISSN
  • 0165-0009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1480
OpenAlex
W4251458200
Cited by
28
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Climatic Change (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  • Mississippi State University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
cotton yield, climate change scenarios, global climate models, regional climate model, elevated CO2, climate change adaptation, irrigation, rainfed agriculture, water stress, southeastern United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review