CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,088Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Strategies and EpistemologiesVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Promoting general metacognitive awareness

Schraw, Gregory·1998·Instructional Science
DOI 10.1023/a:1003044231033
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1003044231033

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Ames, C. & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement in the classroom: Student learning strategies and motivational processes. Journal of Educational Psychology: 260‐267. · DOI
  2. Astington, J.W. (1993). The Child’s Discovery of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  3. Brown, R. & Pressley, M. (1994). Self-regulated reading and getting meaning from text: The Transactional Strategies Instruction model and its ongoing validation. In D.H. Schunk & B.J. Zimmerman, eds., Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications (pp. 155‐180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  4. Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and Reading Comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
  5. Glaser, R. & Chi, M.T. (1988). Overview. In M. Chi, R. Glaser & M. Farr, eds., The Nature of Expertise (pp. xv‐xxviii). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  6. Graham, S. & Weiner, B. (1996). Theories and principles of motivation. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee, eds., Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 63‐84). New York: MacMillian.
  7. Halpern, D.F. (1989). Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking (2nd edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  8. Schmuck, R.A. & Schmuck, P.A. (1992). Group Processes in the Classroom (6th edition). Debuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown Publishers.
  9. Siegler, R.S. & Jenkins, E. (1989). How Children Discover New Strategies. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,088

Related

Metadata

Authors
Schraw, G.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
Schraw, Gregory
Venue
Instructional Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1998-03
Volume
26
Issue
1-2
Pages
113-125
ISSN
  • 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1952
DOI
10.1023/a:1003044231033
OpenAlex
W4254991137
Cited by
1,088
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 122 · 2025: 102 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 82 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 23
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
metacognition, metacognitive awareness, metacognitive knowledge, knowledge of cognition, metacognitive regulation, metacognition instruction, self-knowledge, student self-regulation, learning environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review