CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 227Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchReliability and Agreement in MeasurementBehavioral and Psychological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Brief Report: Interrater Reliability of Clinical Diagnosis and DSM-IV Criteria for Autistic Disorder: Results of the DSM-IV Autism Field Trial

Klin, Ami, Lang, Jason, Cicchetti, Domenic V., Volkmar, Fred R.·2000·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
DOI 10.1023/a:1005415823867
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1005415823867

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Cicchetti, D. V., & Sparrow, S. S. (1981). Developing criteria for establishing inter-rater reliability of specific items in a given inventory. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 127–137.
  2. Fombonne, E. (1998). Epidemiological surveys of autism. In F. R. Volkmar (Ed.), Autism and pervasive developmental disorders (pp. 32–63). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Klin, A., Carter, A., Volkmar, F. R., Cohen, D. J., Marans, W. D., Sparrow, S. S. (1997). Assessment issues in children with autism. In D. J. Cohen & F. R. Volkmar (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (pp. 411–447). New York: Wiley.
  4. Lord, C., Rutter, M., & DiLavore, P. (1996). Autism diagnostic observation schedule-Generic (ADOS-G). Unpublished manuscript. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
  5. Perry, A., Veleno, P., & Factor, D. (1998). Inter-rarer agreement between direct care staff and psychologists for the diagnosis of autism according to DSM-III, DSM-III-R, and DSM-IV. Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 6, 32–43.
  6. Volkmar, F. R., Klin, A., & Cohen, D. J. (1997). Diagnosis and Classificiation of autism and related conditions: Consensus and Issues. In D. J. Cohen & F. R. Volkmar (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (2nd ed., pp. 5–40). New York: Wiley.
  7. World Health Organization. (1993). International classification of diseases (10th rev. chap. 5. Mental and behavioral disorders (including disorders of psychological development). Diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva: Author.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 227

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Klin, A., Lang, J., Cicchetti, D. V., & Volkmar, F. R.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Klin, Ami
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2000-04
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
163-167
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
DOI
10.1023/a:1005415823867
OpenAlex
W1536735458
Cited by
225
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 15
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
inter-rater reliability, autistic disorder, DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, autism diagnosis, diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Autistic Disorder, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review