Cited by 114Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyBipolar Disorder and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multidimensional Dichotomous Thinking Characterizes Borderline Personality Disorder

Veen, Gerthe, Arntz, Arnoud·2000·Cognitive Therapy and Research

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1005498824175

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. American Psychiatric Association (APA). (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., Rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
  2. Arntz, A., Bögels, S., & Hoekstra, R. (1992). Revisie van de Nederlandse vertaling van het Gestructureerd Klinisch Interview voor DSM-III-R (SCID-I) [Revision of the Dutch translation of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID-I)]. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Author.
  3. Beck, A. T., Freeman, A., & Associates (Eds.). (1990). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders. New York: Guilford Press.
  4. Kernberg, O. (1966). Structural derivatives of object relationships. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 47, 236-253.
  5. Kernberg, O. F. (1976). Object relations theory and clinical psycho-analysis. New York: Jason Aronson.
  6. Kernberg, O. F., Selzer, M. A., Koenigsberg, H. W., Carr, A. C., & Appelbaum, A. H. (1989). Psychodynamic psychotherapy of borderline patients. New York: Basic Books.
  7. Layden, M. A., Newman, C. F., Freeman, A., & Byers Morse, S. (1993). Cognitive therapy of borderline personality disorder. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  8. Psychiatrisch Centrum Bloemendaal. (1991). Nederlandse vertaling van het Gestructureerd Klinisch Interview voor DSM-III-R persoonlijkheidsstoornissen [Dutch translation of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R personality disorders]. Bloemendaal, The Netherlands: Author.
  9. SPSS Inc. (1997). SPSS Advanced Statistics 7.5. Chicago: Author.
  10. Westen, D. (1990). Towards a revised theory of borderline object relations: Contributions of empirical research. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 71, 661-693.
  11. Westen, D., Ludolph, P., Silk, K., Kellam, A., Gold, L., & Lohr, N. E. (1990). Object relations in borderline adolescents and adults: Developmental differences. Adolescent Psychiatry, 17, 360-384.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 114

Metadata

Authors
Veen, G., & Arntz, A.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2000-02
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
23-45
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
OpenAlex
W1481103695
Cited by
114
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, dichotomous thinking, splitting, personality disorders, emotional themes, film clips, visual analogue scale, cluster C personality disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review